Stickpucker
Playmaka
- Jan 18, 2014
- 15,306
- 36,882
The return for Skinner make Toronto Faulk proposals look appealing
Check again. A 4th line RW.....the only bonus would be we have Brown and Pu.
The return for Skinner make Toronto Faulk proposals look appealing
Don’t you have a long term need at C? Pu is a good prospect, has enough skill to become a 2C if things turn out for the best.
Skinner just had one year left anyway.
Market for rebuilding teams like us is rough. Look at the O’Reilly trade, we took on two cap dumps for a low first and Thompson. In my opinion the return you got for Skinner is better than what we got for ROR.
Check again. A 4th line RW.....the only bonus would be we have Brown and Pu.
The ignore list is there for a reason, guys.
Bingo. Generic trade board complaints are nothing new around here, but the board can’t be a refuge for personal attacks.
You smell bad
There needs to be a "you're a dick" emoji. I've already admitted that I'd use it on myself occasionally....but boy the joy it would bring being able to fling it at others.....whew....
Never used ignore, don’t know how.
Pretty good at staying away from getting into the back and forth, but also like to think if someone gets into a back and forth with me, I’m pretty good at making them pay for it.
Makes me wonder who ignores me. I imagine it must be because they don’t like constantly being wrong.
I ignore you.Makes me wonder who ignores me. I imagine it must be because they don’t like constantly being wrong.
Makes me wonder who ignores me. I imagine it must be because they don’t like constantly being wrong.
Cross-referencing generally is an important life skill.Easy way to determine it. Go to the Like thread. Post literally anything. Wait a day or two.
Compare the list of people who liked your post to those who liked any of Unsustainable's. Anyone missing off yours could be ignoring you.
Hmmm
So apparently Faulk has no value because the Canes have too many defensemen. At the same time, our trading position is so weak, we'd need to significantly add in a Faulk for Hainsey deal.
One day we need to consolidate these bad offers, force them in NHL 19, and see how the league plays out.LOL ok.
Remember: there are no actual GMs on these boards.
Hmmm
So apparently Faulk has no value because the Canes have too many defensemen. At the same time, our trading position is so weak, we'd need to significantly add in a Faulk for Hainsey deal.