Stylizer1
SENSimillanaire
You would think he would have did a few podcasts in the bank for this mini hiatus. He usually does when he goes on vacation.
Diaz is going back to New Jersey and Burr lives in LA.Not many of his guests are LA based. I think the majority of his comic friends were in LA but they are leaving too like Diaz and Callen. Burr lives in New York I think.
Diaz is already in Jersey. I always thought Burr lived in NYDiaz is going back to New Jersey and Burr lives in LA.
I don't think it's exclusive yet, can't remember the exact date of exclusivity, but it'll be on Spotify and other platforms for a period. At a certain point Spotify will be the only platform.I listen on Google Podcasts now. With his new deal is that all going away?
As of January it only Spotify.I don't think it's exclusive yet, can't remember the exact date of exclusivity, but it'll be on Spotify and other platforms for a period. At a certain point Spotify will be the only platform.
As a Hindu monk myself, this is awesome.
Spotify has no say in what he does going forward. Past episodes I guess they have the right not to post them but I don't think he has had episodes that would not be acceptable.Looks like there are episodes that are not going to be on Spotify, some with the controversial guests. Will be interesting to see if the guest list for future episodes stays similar or if it will have to be Spotify approved.
Looks like there are episodes that are not going to be on Spotify, some with the controversial guests. Will be interesting to see if the guest list for future episodes stays similar or if it will have to be Spotify approved.
I don't have a full list of the episodes not included. Some I can see why, others I don't agree with not being included. Assuming all the youtube content remains, it won't be a huge deal, but I'm worried Joe doesn't have the exact amount of control that he said he would have. Would the people that had their episodes not included be allowed on as guests again? Would people viewed as similar to them be allowed on?Source?
I don't have a full list of the episodes not included. Some I can see why, others I don't agree with not being included. Assuming all the youtube content remains, it won't be a huge deal, but I'm worried Joe doesn't have the exact amount of control that he said he would have. Would the people that had their episodes not included be allowed on as guests again? Would people viewed as similar to them be allowed on?
Joe Rogan debuts on Spotify with his most controversial episodes missing
In a profile of Rogan in The Atlantic last August, writer Devin Gordon broke down Rogan's many strengths as a podcaster, yet also cited some of his guest choices as a serious blindspot: "Joe likes [Jack Dorsey]. He likes Milo Yiannopoulos. He likes Alex Jones
Maybe it's a form of publicity. When this catches on and people start talking about it Spotify decides to post them.I don't have a full list of the episodes not included. Some I can see why, others I don't agree with not being included. Assuming all the youtube content remains, it won't be a huge deal, but I'm worried Joe doesn't have the exact amount of control that he said he would have. Would the people that had their episodes not included be allowed on as guests again? Would people viewed as similar to them be allowed on?
Joe Rogan debuts on Spotify with his most controversial episodes missing
Interesting.
Why was Jack Dorsey mentioned? Did he do something i missed?
Joe likes Jack. He likes Milo Yiannopoulos. He likes Alex Jones. He wants you to know that he doesn’t agree with much of what they say, but he also wants you to know that off camera they’re the nicest guys. If we all have fatal flaws, this is Joe’s: his insistence on seeing value in people even when he shouldn’t, even when they’ve forfeited any right to it, even when the harm outweighs the good. It comes from a generous place, but it amounts to careless cruelty. He just won’t write people off, and then he compounds the sin by throwing them a lifeline at the moment when they least deserve it.
That was an odd one compared to the others. In The Atlantic piece by the person, it talked about the issues of the first Dorsey episode, where Jack just sort of BS'd his way through, and where Joe and the audience had a disconnect on what would happen. Audience wanted some actual pushback on Jack, and Joe just wanted an interesting conversation with the guy. The writer seemed to have more of an issue with the Tim Pool episode that reflected on the Dorsey episode and the episode that included Pool, Dorsey, and Vijaya Gadde. The writer never really explained the critique of Joe liking Jack.
The following paragraph is why that piece is a joke and why some of the Rogan critics just have a fundamental different world-view than people that like him.
Studio is too red and dark.those chairs don't look very comfortable to sit in for 3 hours.