Gary Nylund
Registered User
- Oct 10, 2013
- 30,163
- 22,708
I hope you realize the double standard you're exhibiting. You judge the stats that others use in complete isolation, with no context, with no adjustments, with little understanding of them, and declare them useless because they don't tell you something you personally believe that they're not even designed to tell you, and then you make a whole bunch of excuses and adjustments and exclusions and add a bunch of context when you declare TOI awesome and then it doesn't tell you what you want.
This is all completely false
PP P/60, past 3 seasons:
Kerfoot: 4.91
Kadri: 4.70
This is what Zeke so often does - throw out a bunch of numbers that show a small part of a much bigger picture without saying anything. This raises the question - what's your point?
You do realize that you're comparing an established player's ice time to a rookie, right?
He's not a rookie any more, I just gave the stats for Kerfoot's entire career, I'd hate for you to complain that I left out anything. But you're right that Kadri's more experienced. Perhaps it's not fair to compare these players at all, let's just agree that Kadri's better. Oh wait, we already did.
It's pretty funny that we agree that Kadri is the better player, yet you're giving me a hard time without questioning Zeke how his "analysis" led him to the wrong conclusion. Perhaps you can explain why this is?