The Great Fight Debate thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

Dr Hook

It’s Called Ruins
Sponsor
Mar 9, 2005
14,088
20,861
Tyler, TX
For me it isn't about the hits or the fighting at this point. Hit totals are weird because it's all in how you define a hit and says nothing about the quality of the hit, the effectiveness of it, nothing. It is a probably a broadly indicative stat that needs a lot of qualification. My problem with the team at this point is the lack of attitude- I guess hockey aggression- that the team shows. They appear so very passive. I would like to see them impose themselves physically in games and they just don't, or maybe can't. I don't know if it is a personnel issue (as some here claim), a coaching issue, an actual biological inability . . . I don't know, but I would like to see some changes in that regard. They don't have to be the Broad Street Bullies or Big Bad Bruins- we'd be killing penalties 58 out of 60 minutes LOL- but something seems missing, some spark, some jam. :dunno:
 

Gee Wally

Old, Grumpy Moderator
Sponsor
Feb 27, 2002
74,627
89,556
HF retirement home
It's high time the Mods locked up this Sheep in Wolves Clothing Part III thread, because this debate is ridiculous.

Neither side will admit the other has valid points.

Neither side can actually prove their viewpoint is true or not.

What a waste of time.


Nope.
I agree it will never be settled or not for at least another decade or so.

But this thread and siblings will go on. Why? To contain the Pepsi-Coke lunacy from invading other threads . Thereby allowing others to stay out of this and not be contaminated by it in the other subjects.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Glove Malfunction

BruinsFanSince94

The Perfect Fan ™
Sep 28, 2017
32,709
43,379
New England
Nope.
I agree it will never be settled or not for at least another decade or so.

But this thread and siblings will go on. Why? To contain the Pepsi-Coke lunacy from invading other threads . Thereby allowing others to stay out of this and not be contaminated by it in the other subjects.

They still bring their tough guy nonsense into other threads though?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chief Nine

BruinDust

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
24,375
21,821
Nope.
I agree it will never be settled or not for at least another decade or so.

But this thread and siblings will go on. Why? To contain the Pepsi-Coke lunacy from invading other threads . Thereby allowing others to stay out of this and not be contaminated by it in the other subjects.

True, serves a purpose I guess.
 

Fenian24

Registered User
Jun 14, 2010
10,370
13,480
team needs an Andrew Ference type WAAAAYYYYYYY more than it needs a Shawn Thornton type, although i think the forward group needs that type of player more than the blueliners do.

Both would be nice. Lauzon may project out as a bigger, not as physical version of Ference down the road, which would make him a great pick. With the Heinen's, Bjork's, Donato's and other smaller, more passive prospects at forward a Thornton would be a welcome addition.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sarge88

PatriceBergeronFan

Registered User
Jul 15, 2011
59,767
37,419
USA
Bruins don't fight......checks hockeyfights.com.....league leader, Bruins...

Bruins don't stick up for each other.....checks hockeyfights.com....last three fights were sticking up for each other...

But but but but the Bruins fighting are too small.

Did anyone else not see Gudbranson **** himself when Chara came calling? Does that not count? he was quiet the entire rest of the game.


Uh... your first two points are utter BS with all due respect. Marchand and Krug fighting, yeah that's what we mean! :sarcasm: Then again, Campbell only had one fight here too, when he beat the Montreal player.

The last point is legitimate. Chara did his job there.
 

xStanleyCupsFor

Registered User
Sep 12, 2014
1,730
988
I'll play this game.

Gudbranson, Archibald, Virtanen, Roussel, and I suppose Beagle who does not play.

Vancouver is not a tough team either which makes this even sadder.

It does feel like outside of a handful, and this is leaguewide, players are secretly very happy the NHL has become a systems, unemotional, soft league where going through the motions and collecting large pay checks is acceptable.

I cannot believe we are softer than this bunch. Sad times indeed.

Chara, Miller(shoulder problems), Backes(cooked)....and?....and?....Wagner/Acciari? Good lord!!
 

neelynugs

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
35,445
9,923
Don’t know much about him. But thought Archibald was a pretty good guy about it and didn’t take Krug to pound town.

More of a wrestle this little fellow down nicely type rumble lol

yeah, i thought he took it easy on krug for sure. sorta like the little brother who would come after you,
and you're holding his head while his feet spin around.
 

RussellmaniaKW

Registered User
Sep 15, 2004
19,699
21,808
I'll play this game.

Gudbranson, Archibald, Virtanen, Roussel, and I suppose Beagle who does not play.

Vancouver is not a tough team either which makes this even sadder.

It does feel like outside of a handful, and this is leaguewide, players are secretly very happy the NHL has become a systems, unemotional, soft league where going through the motions and collecting large pay checks is acceptable.

This is an interesting point. I think there's a lot of truth to this but mainly during the regular season. The playoffs are still intense and a blast to watch. I think the game becoming softer over an 82 game season isn't entirely on rule changes or aversion to violence as it is that the players are richer than ever and too comfortable to be going out there playing balls to the wall every other night when they can often cruise to OT, get a point or two and only bother going all-out when the playoffs start and the games actually matter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PatriceBergeronFan

RussellmaniaKW

Registered User
Sep 15, 2004
19,699
21,808
team needs an Andrew Ference type WAAAAYYYYYYY more than it needs a Shawn Thornton type, although i think the forward group needs that type of player more than the blueliners do.
I think Wagner brings a bit of that. He's always in the mix and you can tell all the west coast teams that know him from his Anaheim days can't stand him.
 

DrJustice

Registered User
Dec 1, 2014
2,420
2,223
Boston, MA
It belongs in every thread, Sheppy! I think you have 10+ pre-written *****es about toughness saved in a word document that you pull out during the games to copy/paste in the GDT.

I'm personally hoping for the team to get Alex Semin out of retirement and advocate for no-touch hockey.
 

RussellmaniaKW

Registered User
Sep 15, 2004
19,699
21,808
I think it's more of the same, "team is soft, team is weak," posts constantly by a select few.
there are a handful of regular posters here that I swear to god I have never seen praise an actual hockey play but will post in every thread about how the team needs to be bigger or tougher.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chief Nine

Chief Nine

Registered User
May 31, 2015
12,006
15,755
there are a handful of regular posters here that I swear to god I have never seen praise an actual hockey play but will post in every thread about how the team needs to be bigger or tougher.

Because that’s all they want to get out of hockey, the word skill is like poison to them
 

ODAAT

Registered User
Oct 17, 2006
52,268
20,493
Victoria BC
If there is a big hit in a game you better believe it will be brought up....

I think therein lies the issue, a "big hit", for this fan, does not automatically have me feel a guy is a tough player. Now, it`s definitely part of what constitutes being or playing tough but being a guy who is consistently out there laying out opponents alone doesn`t mean that player is tough.

Same goes for fisticuffs, another aspect but not the key for me to identify a guy as being tough.

Brief story, I was a barely above average player during the days where I didn`t have grey hair, moved from Oakville back to Ottawa and was at the tryouts for the AA team, as many know here, there`s as much politics at the amateur level as with higher one`s and the lineup that was expected to be chosen, as I found out after, seemed well established and I was likely to be cut and off to A level.

I wound up making the team and the coaches spoke with each player individually after the cuts were made and this coach ( Paterson ,can`t recall first name) but his son Mark had a cup of coffee in the NHL said THE reason he was cutting player X who had been part of the team the year previous in favor of me was that in spite of my lack of natural skill and lack of size, I played each shift hard, played responsible and while I was nothing close to being a bruiser, I planted my arse in front of the opponents net and drove them nutso but he said what solidified it was during a little pre-season game, I dropped down and blocked a shot with little to no time left and he said that was what convinced he and the other coaches I`d be a guy they could put in the lineup.

It`s that sort of thing that I love watching from players, yep, drives me nuts when I see a Gallagher from the Habs do it but the guy is tough as nails in the sense that he NEVER hesitates to go to the front of the net, in the corners and muck it up, that`s toughness to me, there are plenty of guys on the B`s who aren`t 6`5 but that doesn`t mean they can`t play tougher but the problem with toughness, IMO, is you can`t teach it, a player either has it within himself or he doesn`t.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad