Mr Fahrenheit
Valar Morghulis
- Oct 9, 2009
- 7,789
- 3,281
Luke contemplating killing Ben was so awful, does anyone think Yoda would of done that?
Luke contemplating killing Ben was so awful, does anyone think Yoda would of done that?
The Last Jedi is reactionary corporate trash that's filled with studio mandated check list items.
It's not highbrow, intellectual or artistic. It's not deep or thoughtful. It's not "indie". Perceptions of it aren't going to improve over time. The movie just sucks.
Luke contemplating killing Ben was so awful, does anyone think Yoda would of done that?
I'm not saying they are the exact same, I am saying that Luke isn't above abandoning a pacifist approach depending on the circumstances.You're equating raging at someone who taunted him in the middle of a duel to murdering a defenseless boy in his sleep after contemplating his course of action. Those are wildly different circumstances. One does not mean that the other is also in character.
You are making a lot of assumptions about what you think Luke is and always will be regardless of the circumstances.Whether it makes sense or has been done in other franchises is beside the point. What matters is what Luke, a noble Jedi, would do. George Lucas based the Jedi on the samurai, not just in their swordplay, but in their code of conduct. Like samurai, Jedi don't kill defenseless or unsuspecting people because it's not honorable. After he chops off Vader's lightsaber-holding hand in RotJ, Luke doesn't finish him off. He switches off his lightsaber and turns his back to him.
Where are you getting all this from? Certainly not the movies.For 40 years, Luke was the quintessential Jedi. Even if every other Jedi fell to the dark side or broke the Jedi code, Luke could be expected to stick to the Jedi principles and always do the right thing. While he does ultimately do the right thing in TLJ and doesn't kill Kylo in his sleep, it's out of character for him to even consider it, especially since he's the protector of the ancient Jedi texts that presumably contain that rule and all others that he lives by.
For starters, your idea is incredibly lame. Secondly, you actually believe that Luke contemplating murdering Ben was his FIRST attempt at a solution?I think that what would've been more in character would've been for Luke to confront Kylo and kill him in a duel, if necessary, or, an even more noble of a solution: pursue and defeat Snoke, the source of the corruption. Murdering him in his sleep wasn't the only solution to the problem, and a true Jedi would've tried all others first.
The force allowed her to do these things, as she cannot believe that she was able to pull off the maneuvers she did and comments about it. This is a major nitpick.That was to be my next point. Even if she had flown the Falcon on occasion, it would've been just moving it around out in the open, not dogfighting and flying fast in very tight spaces. She wouldn't have had any idea how hard it could bank/climb/dive, yet she never catastrophically misjudged any of those variables even once. It's like how driving a Formula 1 to the grocery store a few times doesn't prepare you for how it handles at top speed and with tight turns.
Capable when you can get it running. It has proven over the films to be unreliable at times and as a ship that is likely not even being produced any more (it's what, 50+ years old) it makes perfect sense for Rey to initially choose a newer more reliable ship and call it out as garbage.To answer your question, I don't think that it matters whether you think that the Falcon is exceptional (as Han does) or a hunk of junk (as the rest of the galaxy does). What matters is that, through four films, it's been proven to be a very capable and nimble ship.
Wasn't the point of Luke almost killing Ben that even the legendary Jedi Master Luke Skywalker can screw up? Is Luke supposed to be a pure and perfect human being?
forget that Luke has been shown to be susceptible to the dark side? He has always been shown as a conflicted Jedi, he has Vader's blood in him.
he also has always been shown as an emotional, rash and reactive. He's never been shown as the picture of patience like Yoda has.
I'm not saying they are the exact same, I am saying that Luke isn't above abandoning a pacifist approach depending on the circumstances.
For starters, your idea is incredibly lame. Secondly, you actually believe that Luke contemplating murdering Ben was his FIRST attempt at a solution?
The force allowed her to do these things, as she cannot believe that she was able to pull off the maneuvers she did and comments about it. This is a major nitpick.
Capable when you can get it running. It has proven over the films to be unreliable at times and as a ship that is likely not even being produced any more (it's what, 50+ years old) it makes perfect sense for Rey to initially choose a newer more reliable ship and call it out as garbage.
Regardless of whether it was the Force or not, this is why she's called a Mary Sue, because things like that come so easily for her.
In the first movie, Luke, who had never flown a fighter before, managed to blow up the Death Star by pulling off a shot that pilots with many years of experience and using their advanced targeting systems couldn't come close to pulling off successfully. The shot was considered to be nearly impossible. At the time, Luke wasn't using the targeting system and R2-D2 was disabled.
Clearly, he also used the Force to fire on the Death Star, but he had extensive flying and aiming experience beforehand and he used the Force only to know when to simply pull a trigger. I really don't see that as comparable to having little experience and using the Force to continuously pull off stunt flying while under duress and Earth-like gravity in a ship that she might not have ever flown before.
Either she was familiar with it, which is why she was able to fly it, or she was unfamiliar with it and its capabilities, which is why she dismissed it and called it garbage.
-She's confident enough at this point to fly something. That implies some form of experience I would think.
-In fact, it's pretty similar to what Luke says to Han.
2. Finn: You ever fly this thing?
Rey: No! This ship hasn't flown in years.
-She has experience flying in gravity, she just doesn't have experience flying outside of a gravity well.
People shouldn't get "pissed" about not liking a movie.
I can't believe people are getting worked up about what type of controls were in the cockpit of various ships. If that's the type of stuff that is making or breaking a space fantasy movie for you, you need to seriously re-evaluate how you watch movies.
What's funny is your assumption that the original ship they were running towards wasn't superior to the Falcon in virtually every way at that point in time - at least in a comparative sense which is how it was portrayed.
Given how much time has gone by since the Falcon was built, there are pretty good odds that it's a better ship, or at least, better maintained and ready to fly.
After all, she says "it hasn't flown in years".
She knows better than anyone given how much time she has spent at the spaceport.
Like I said. For some reason the suspension of disbelief doesn't work the same way for Rey that it did for Luke.
I say this as someome who somewhat believed in the Mary Sue narrative until I re-watched ANH and ESB and realized it was complete bullcrap.
So apart from ham-fisting in continuity to the OT there's no way the Falcon should just be left sitting in some junk yard without an owner.