Mr Fahrenheit
Valar Morghulis
- Oct 9, 2009
- 7,787
- 3,275
"Jedi Knight force adept."
What is that and what way are you measuring it?
A mysterious, all powerful Sith lord that ... got punked by his apprentice in the lamest way possible.
Have you watched ROTJ by chance?
* Vader killed the Emperor to save his son, which was a noble sacrifice (of both his position of power and his life). Kylo killed Snoke because he was mistreated and to inherit his position, which were bitter, selfish and power-hungry motives.
We may yet find out. It also leaves it open for the growing canon EU to address. As well as the Resistance tv show that’s coming and is set in that time period.
I'm hardly an expert but I think that's fair video game-y terms for Star Wars.
Force adept: someone who can use the force. Also works as the first 'rank' in that those with it have no control but can pull off incredible feats on instinct
Rankings:
Adept
Apprentice/Padawan
Jedi Knight
Jedi Master
Basically going by the OT, Luke would be an adept in ANH, an apprentice in ESB, and a Jedi Knight in RotJ. By the time we get to TFA he's a Jedi Master.
If you want to make a comparison out of it, at the apprentice level after getting his but kicked by Vader in ESB there's the iconic point in RotJ where as a Jedi Knight Luke voluntarily goes to Vader and ends up confronting the Emperor. With the new trilogy, that gets fast forwarded and Rey ends up confronting Snope with Kylo Ren right in the 2nd movie without much of a learning curve.
While there are some similarities, there are some key differences, I think.
* The Emperor didn't berate Vader and make a big deal about knowing his thoughts to make his eventual death seem more humiliating.
* The Emperor had time to realize that Vader was turning on him and, arguably, fought back by directing an ultimately lethal dose of lightning into him. Snoke was dead before he could react (unless making a funny, surprised face counts).
* Vader killed the Emperor to save his son, which was a noble sacrifice (of both his position of power and his life). Kylo killed Snoke because he was mistreated and to inherit his position, which were bitter, selfish and power-hungry motives.
* Besides promoting the theme of sacrifice, the Emperor's death also provided redemption for Vader. Kylo killing Snoke didn't really contribute to any themes (except, maybe, karma).
Because of those circumstances, the Emperor's death didn't feel lame, IMO. It wasn't trying to be cool, but poignant and powerful. Snoke's death, on the other hand, lacked any poignancy or power and just came across as a cool scene that we were supposed to cheer for, and when you try to be cool and fail, you usually end up looking lame.
Because of those circumstances, the Emperor's death didn't feel lame, IMO. It wasn't trying to be cool, but poignant and powerful. Snoke's death, on the other hand, lacked any poignancy or power and just came across as a cool scene that we were supposed to cheer for, and when you try to be cool and fail, you usually end up looking lame.
I don't envy the "canon" people right now.
They must be doing all kinds of mental gymnastics to try and successfully incorporate the new films into the existing SW universe.
Do people still defend this pile of ****?
You realize **** like this just stirs the pot even more, right?
Which, from my perspective, is an ass backwards way to approach it. I prefer to modify my understanding of the SW universe based on new information.
Yeah but the writers really couldn’t give two ****s about continuity so it’s up to the uber nerds to try and explain it.
There are no continuity issues in the SW universe that I’m aware of... as long as you consider all of the old EU stuff to be out the window.
I'm glad they replaced Y-wings and B-wings with ships that have to fly over their targets and release bombs.
I'll just assume that technology took a few giant leaps backward.
I'm glad they replaced Y-wings and B-wings with ships that have to fly over their targets and release bombs.
I'll just assume that technology took a few giant leaps backward.
couldnt possibly be that the resistance was decimated and those bombers were the best they had left.
and its not like any military has ever used slower/vulnerable bombers with large payloads (ahem, B52) while having faster ones that carry less (ahem, B1, B2) at their disposal
More evidence of Star Wars brand damage, checking my email, EB Games Friday deals includes a bunch of old games for $5....the newest game on sale and the only current generation game in their flyer, Star Wars: Battlefront for PS4 is on sale for $5.00.
Rey didnt confront sh*t.
Snoke toyed with her and had her under complete physical and mental control like a child throwing around a stuffed animal. She showed zero power or resistance in the entire interaction.
It doesnt take any Force power to walk up to a main bad guy and get destroyed.
its a recycled used game put up for sale by EBgames not a new version price drop by Disney. Really reaching here.
Oh wow a GOTG POP doll is on sale for 5.00 !!! must be brand damage from GOTG2 which wasn't that great!! see how dumb that sounds.