Old hound
Registered User
- Feb 27, 2018
- 169
- 110
Thanks! I must say I enjoy reading your posts. I thought the samorukov hit was clean but I’d have to watch it again.. As for the game last night I thought it was an entertaining, fast game between two skilled teams. It could’ve went either way.. and two rebound goals were the difference. I thought the Greyhounds controlled majority of the play. Definitely a much better game than WednesdayAfter re-reading, I think he was referring to posts outside of here, on other "social media". I thought your post was a measured and thoughtful assessment.
First of all, your reasoning isn't even consistent with the factors stated by the league announcing the discipline.It's hard to make a thoughtful response to this when you are so out to lunch as to what happened on the hit. Taking several strides towards a vulnerable player and absolutely crushing him in the middle of the face with your shoulder is as dangerous as a hit can be.
There was broad consensus that Lochead was going to miss playoff games, if not the rest of the season.
First of all, your reasoning isn't even consistent with the factors stated by the league announcing the discipline.
Second, I get the distinct impression you don't have a clue about how the play unfolded. Lochead left the slot area and only went for the hit when he saw additional D coverage in the zone as another winger was present. That took time to evolve. It wasn't several strides. To do so he would have abandoned his position with other offensive players entering the zone which he didn't do.
Third, you fail to consider game factors on the hit. Circumstances of the game called for a momentum change at that time as they were losing by two. Lochead didn't go out of his way to hurt the Guelph player and your post to the contrary is flat out wrong.
Four, in fact, he slowed up before making contact. The Guelph defender, not forward position, had his head down which largely contributed to the consequences from the hit as he wasn't protecting himself.
All in, you've made many wrong statements about what actually happened.
*fourth added on edit
Narrative. I sat five rows immediately behind the play. I don't need to watch the video for the narrative. To truly understand you'd have to be live and then watch the hit to comment on both.I'm getting the exact same impression from you since you obviously haven't seen the entire video.
Lochead leaves the slot area and takes 6 strides directly towards Samorukov. His head and presumably his eyes are locked on him the entire time. It's obvious that he is lining up the hit from the start. He's not surveying the zone. He doesn't even look at the winger. You're simply making up a false narrative to defend your player.
As he approaches, he lowers his shoulder and turns in order to get Samorukov directly in the head. That was not necessary to strip Samorukov of the puck. It's one of the clearest examples of headhunting that you will ever see.
Disagree with me if you wish, but your blatant lies make it frustrating to have a real conversation. Watch the video again.
I'll make it simple for you.I'm getting the exact same impression from you since you obviously haven't seen the entire video.
Lochead leaves the slot area and takes 6 strides directly towards Samorukov. His head and presumably his eyes are locked on him the entire time. It's obvious that he is lining up the hit from the start. He's not surveying the zone. He doesn't even look at the winger. You're simply making up a false narrative to defend your player.
As he approaches, he lowers his shoulder and turns in order to get Samorukov directly in the head. That was not necessary to strip Samorukov of the puck. It's one of the clearest examples of headhunting that you will ever see.
Disagree with me if you wish, but your blatant lies make it frustrating to have a real conversation. Watch the video again.
Also, in your posts, you refer to Lochead taking several strides. But, in your video it should show that he in fact stopped skating and wasn't taking strides immediately before the point of impact. Explain that one.I'm getting the exact same impression from you since you obviously haven't seen the entire video.
Lochead leaves the slot area and takes 6 strides directly towards Samorukov. His head and presumably his eyes are locked on him the entire time. It's obvious that he is lining up the hit from the start. He's not surveying the zone. He doesn't even look at the winger. You're simply making up a false narrative to defend your player.
As he approaches, he lowers his shoulder and turns in order to get Samorukov directly in the head. That was not necessary to strip Samorukov of the puck. It's one of the clearest examples of headhunting that you will ever see.
Disagree with me if you wish, but your blatant lies make it frustrating to have a real conversation. Watch the video again.
If the playoffs started today we would be playing Owen sound in the first round and I would wager we beat them in 6If the playoffs started today, who do the Hounds play? Who wins series in how many games?
FB, so far, he's made accusations about
-London Knights and their forum,
-says to another poster, it's hard to make a thoughtful response,
-accuses a fan/poster who was actually live and present at the game of lieing about what was observed at the game,
-fails to appreciate or be able to identify game script,
-doesn't factor in the increased suspension because of discipline history,
-doesn't consider a penalty called only after the ref checks the Guelph player's face for blood- likely doesn't even know that happened,
-doesn't understand nor may not be able to even see on video players on ice,
-has not addressed his posts from the perspective of the players and positions on ice and understanding why Lochead is taking certain strides on ice and his reasoning for how the play unfolded,
-doesn't explain why the Guelph player has a greater right to the ice that Lochead had already occupied,
-fails to explain the Guelph player carrying in the puck head down and putting himself in a vulnerable position,
-rests entire theory of what happened on video and interpretation of the video is contrary to the league review,
-doesn't factor in that Lochead witnessed Samorukov laying out Cotter just a couple weeks before the game in question, and
-accuses others of making statements, and putting forward false comments about what happened.
The same poster has yet to put anything posted on the topic into question, nor call this poster out over any of the posts.
At the most.If the playoffs started today we would be playing Owen sound in the first round and I would wager we beat them in 6
I believe whomever the Bears play, it will be short and not so sweet.At the most.
He was seen working out after Sunday's game perhaps he's not too far off from playing againIs anybody else getting worried that Haytons injury is worse than they are letting us know ? When playoffs start and if we get a couple of injuries to say Frost or Sambrook or Villalta or Howdeshell or Hollowell of Hayton we are probably done we can’t afford any one of these elite players to be out of the lineup
me at hello lolTrading Demeo was flies in the face of common sense......
Ya sorry Mills. The Hounds are strong is all I was saying.I believe whomever the Bears play, it will be short and not so sweet.
I hear ya. I hope for you guys he’s back soon but I saw the play and thought uh oh right away.Is anybody else getting worried that Haytons injury is worse than they are letting us know ? When playoffs start and if we get a couple of injuries to say Frost or Sambrook or Villalta or Howdeshell or Hollowell of Hayton we are probably done we can’t afford any one of these elite players to be out of the lineup
Watch out here comes Guelph. All the teams that loaded up at the trade deadline are about to catch us or pass us in the standings. We need to at least finish 3rd over all to avoid Kitchener in the first round. Would hate to be eliminated in the first round.
It's true we've performed much better against London than Saginaw or Guelph, so maybe facing London in the second round wouldn't be so bad.Guelph IMHO is the team to beat in the West, but I'm surprised you would express concern over Kitchener. I would think they would be a speed bump for you guys.
London can't buy a win against you so we're in a toss up of who would be worse to face in rounds 2 or 3, the Storm or the Greyhounds.
Dark Horse : watch out for Saginaw....