sipowicz
The thrill is gone
- Mar 16, 2011
- 31,761
- 41,521
Just learned on another forum that Lowry hates Laine because he is lazy and that Laine dines alone at McD's when the rest do team meals!
Well that is a lie.Just learned on another forum that Lowry hates Laine because he is lazy and that Laine dines alone at McD's when the rest do team meals!
So he's not elite on the PP and not elite at even strength? How did he put up 91 points then?
Just learned on another forum that Lowry hates Laine because he is lazy and that Laine dines alone at McD's when the rest do team meals!
Maybe Maurice is showing favouritism to those who are committing to the system...If there actually is a divide in the room it is most definitely due to Maurice’s unjustified and obvious favouritism of the vets. His style of leadership creates a two tiered locker room. It’s painfully obvious.
Maybe Maurice is showing favouritism to those who are committing to the system...
So no? Cause the metrics are able to distinguish which players aren’t buying into the system, and how it affects the top line corsi? You can’t measure how much when you don’t even know who.. So your answer of a definite sounding “no” makes me dismiss any analytics you throw out there. Maybe Scheif is one of the players,Actually,over the last 2 months of the regular season, The top line had the poorest Corsi metrics...so, no.
The underlying metrics reveal that it is quite obvious that Maurice blindly favoured them.
So no? Cause the metrics are able to distinguish which players aren’t buying into the system, and how it affects the top line corsi? You can’t measure how much when you don’t even know who.. So your answer of a definite sounding “no” makes me dismiss any analytics you throw out there
Like I said maybe Scheif wasn’t buying in, but who are you going to play at #1 Center? Al? JR? I doubt Little since we keep trying to replace him at the TDL. My point is you are trying to answer problems with analytics but the real fact is you don’t know what the problems are unless your part of the team. You only get to watch the result of undefined problems like the entire planet outside of the Jets locker roomIt looks like we’ll have to agree to disagree then. I feel it is painfully obvious that Maurice blindly favoured Scheif and Wheeler. He also never even attempted to split them up. I think most on thus forum would agree.
So no? Cause the metrics are able to distinguish which players aren’t buying into the system, and how it affects the top line corsi? You can’t measure how much when you don’t even know who.. So your answer of a definite sounding “no” makes me dismiss any analytics you throw out there. Maybe Scheif is one of the players,
Like I said maybe Scheif wasn’t buying in, but who are you going to play at #1 Center? Al? JR? I doubt Little since we keep trying to replace him at the TDL. My point is you are trying to answer problems with analytics but the real fact is you don’t know what the problems are unless your part of the team. You only get to watch the result of undefined problems like the entire planet outside of the Jets locker room
I would argue that is a result of not playing the system correctlyIf the system was to cheat for offense and be out of position in their own end then they performed it to a T.
I would argue that is a result of not playing the system correctly
I will say that is one of many possibilities....I would agree with you there. We don’t know for sure because we are not in the locker room. However, if I would hazard a guess, it would be due to Maurice’s blatant favouritism towards vets.
You call that learning do you?Just learned on another forum that Lowry hates Laine because he is lazy and that Laine dines alone at McD's when the rest do team meals!
Maybe it’s only the Wheeler , Buff and Little buying in... my point is you don’t know if it’s the vets, YG, Leaders, a combination. Maybe YG are rebelling?Exactly my point, as team leaders for whatever reason they didn't adhere to it. That has a trickle down effect on the rest of the team. If the team leaders aren't doing what they are supposed to while still getting all the ice time then I am not surprised to see other players follow the lead and not adhere to the system.
Exactly! That first line was cheating responsible defensive zone roles-especially since January.I would argue that is a result of not playing the system correctly
Everyone must be accountable but everyone’s must be handled differently. When you lead you know which people need a kick in the butt, which ones need just a look , which ones need encouragement . It’s no different running businessesExactly! That first line was cheating responsible defensive zone roles-especially since January.
However, Maurice remained unjustifiably loyal. On the other hand, when younger players played irresponsibly they were punished with less ice time or being pulled from the following game or being demoted.
That time of favouritism is not healthy for for any work environment-EVERYONE must be held accountable.
Everyone must be accountable but everyone’s must be handled differently. When you lead you know which people need a kick in the butt, which ones need just a look , which ones need encouragement . It’s no different running businesses
Everyone must be accountable but everyone’s must be handled differently. When you lead you know which people need a kick in the butt, which ones need just a look , which ones need encouragement . It’s no different running businesses
Exactly! That first line was cheating responsible defensive zone roles-especially since January.
However, Maurice remained unjustifiably loyal. On the other hand, when younger players played irresponsibly they were punished with less ice time or being pulled from the following game or being demoted.
That time of favouritism is not healthy for for any work environment-EVERYONE must be held accountable.
Agree with that... also just purely speculation but maybe the top line cheating may still give a better chance to win than the YG who he sees daily and knows are not ready. We will never know unless we get to live through his eyesWell he clearly didn't push the right ones then as the unwanted behavior continued for the first line.
I guess you know he kept them on the first together out of loyalty?Again, I guess we’ll have to agree to disagree. You feel that Maurice’s unwavering loyalty to Scheif and Wheeler was appropriate leadership and worked for the betterment of the team. I hold the opposite opinion.
I guess you know he kept them on the first together out of loyalty?