Yes, many people are saying that.
Should Toews retire? I think yes.
Why do you keep bringing up Toews? He has nothing to do with this conversation. I'm not saying Crosby should retire right now. But at some point he should look at what is more important. The extra 4-5 years of hockey he may get, or the next 40 years of his life...
Thanks for pointing that out.. I missed it. You're flat out wrong. Crosby had an undiagnosed neck injury that was causing his prolonged symptoms. Once it was diagnosed and treated he returned. The concussion didn't linger, the neck injury did.
http://www.espn.com/nhl/story/_/id/7556814/sidney-crosby-neck-injury-requires-complex-explanation
Does it state in there any definitive date of when his "concussion symptoms" stopped, and it was determined it was a neck injury the entire time? There's nowhere that says "he missed those previous 70 games before the "neck injury" due to the undiagnosed "neck injury". None of it gives definitive dates, therefore you, just like I, have no idea when one thing stopped, and the other started. But the most reported issue was concussion symptoms until he played the 8 games, then got diagnosed with the neck injury, and missed 40 more.
But history has *nothing* to do with how long a player should sit out for. That's what you were insinuating and what I was questioning. Player Q might suffer a concussion that takes 6 months to heal and the next one might resolve overnight. History has *nothing* to do with how long a player should sit out, and if you think it does, you should direct your concern towards countless other NHL players that sit out varying amounts of times from different concussions.
Now you're just arguing points I never even raised. Losing consciousness isn't the tell tale sign of a concussion? No ****.