DangerDave
Mete's Shot
Lol really? Please stop...define impact.
Lol really? Please stop...define impact.
Lol really? Please stop...
Wow, just noticed....
Weber
6GP.......3 goals
Subban
18GP.....2 goals
What happened to Subby Doo?? I honestly don’t know the extent of his injury...
no one is forcing you to read my postsLol really? Please stop...
if it's so clear, you'll have no problem defining it right ?His impact is clear, the guy plays 30min a game. Half the game....
Some people with agenda I guess.
You saying he hasn't had an impact since coming back is ridiculous is all. Even if you didn't watch the game, it's pretty obvious that he's had an impact. If you can't even be objective, why bother posting at all?no one is forcing you to read my posts
no one is forcing you to reply to my posts
I get it that you want to deflect ANY question that could (yes COULD) make him look human
ANY D of NHL calibre would have done that, relegate another 3rd pairing D to the 3rd pair- 5 pts in 6 games with 3 goals
- Clears the front of the net very easily
- Bumps one 3rd pairing guy down to the ... well, 3rd pair!.
- 4 wins, 2 loses with him in the line-up
- 13 goals allowed (2.17 GAA). Look at the GAA before him?
where did I say that ?You saying he hasn't had an impact since coming back is ridiculous is all. Even if you didn't watch the game, it's pretty obvious that he's had an impact. If you can't even be objective, why bother posting at all?
ANY D of NHL calibre would have done that, relegate another 3rd pairing D to the 3rd pair
Habs were doing well without him too
where did I say that ?
and if you can't read, why bother replying at all?
Wow, just noticed....
Weber
6GP.......3 goals
Subban
18GP.....2 goals
What happened to Subby Doo?? I honestly don’t know the extent of his injury...
Not spinning anything, simply asked you to define it.The GAA is the major difference. And his 3 goals in 6 games also helped us win the 4 games in the span. No matter how you spin it, Weber back in the line-up is a major impact. Evidence is there.
if it's so clear, you'll have no problem defining it right ?
Not spinning anything, simply asked you to define it.
actually, IMO, the biggest difference is the presence alone... I mean, we went from 1 NHL calibre D in the line up to TWO... one of the two being a #1D...
Sample size is small, but FWIW, Weber has a higher oZone start percentage and has averaged more ice time per game. That said, it’s clear Weber has returned in a big way.
Weber had a serious injury (obviously) and given hockey is like 99% skating, a messed up foot/leg recovery like he did is impressive.
However, without knowing exactly what’s up with PK, he has had recurring upper body injuries past several seasons. We don’t know if he was playing through pain this year either. I am only making an assumption, but if it is a neck injury, having gone through a stinger myself, that crap is painful AF to play through, let alone live a normal life.
Anyhow, points are important as you need to score to win, but Nashville has been playing close to .500 hockey since PK went down whereas they were dominant and top of the conference when he did play.
Well you have 4 other posters replying to it so if you can't convey your message properly why bother posting at all?where did I say that ?
and if you can't read, why bother replying at all?
played 29m ONE game. he's not blocking shots more than half the other Habs D, his shot - while hard - did NOT improves Habs PP... are you sure you watched Habs games since his return ?A player that plays 30 min a game, block shots, have a huge shot on PP so it opens other players and can score himself, clear the net, known leader (aka captain), can deliver hits.... easy to see when we watch the game.
so, where did I say that he has NO impact ? ?Well you have 4 other posters replying to it so if you can't convey your message properly why bother posting at all?
Come on man it doesn't take a great hockey mind to see how well he's played
Personally, I got heat for it but I said it all along... I was only concerned with set backs in Weber's recovery. Once there were no setbacks, he was good to go and I expected him to provide impact. 12 months off actually helped him IMO. He's fresh and ready to go!
played 29m ONE game. he's not blocking shots more than half the other Habs D, his shot - while hard - did NOT improves Habs PP... are you sure you watched Habs games since his return ?
you read his bio. YOu're just listing attributes.
You were clearly implying it. Don't act dumb now. And you're free to ignore me too. Go right ahead lol.so, where did I say that he has NO impact ? ?
I mean, you'rte not making this up, you really read that right ? but where ?
and what's with the "why posting" comments ? how about you don't tell me what, how, when to post ?
you dont like my posts ? solution is VERY easy, and I encourage you to use it right now.
what agenda ?hey sibolac. Yes I did and he does exactly that. Stop with your agenda. I'm sorry he plays 25-29min a game then. Happy ?
I didn't read any bio like you said. I think you just want us to put you on 'Ignore list'.
so... I did not say it ?You were clearly implying it. Don't act dumb now.
what agenda ?