Dr Quincy
Registered User
- Jun 19, 2005
- 28,713
- 10,571
I'm following from afar and watching when I can. Limited opportunity and still building trust to get a better roll, but he has a knack for scoring goals.How has he been for you guys?
I'm following from afar and watching when I can. Limited opportunity and still building trust to get a better roll, but he has a knack for scoring goals.How has he been for you guys?
Raty will be top 5 and probably top 3.I like Raty, but doubt SJ takes a fin. Raty may not be top 10, so maybe if Sharks bubble.
Power, Hughes and Kent Johnson all look great if sharks mirror last season. Would be hard to pass on a Hughes brother, besides Luke is a much cooler name than Quinn or Jack so we'd have that. lols
Hrabik and Raska both were returned in Czech second league.
Hrabik - 1 goal, 1 assist, 2nd line.
Raska - 1 assist, 4th line.
Bergmann - 1 goal (GWG), 2nd line.
Blichfeld - 1st line.
True - didn’t play.
Knyazev (VHL) - 1 SOG, “0”, 19:36, 1st pair.
Korenar - 23/30, team lost 6:7 (OT).
Thank you!You can always check Lean's stats if you visit del.org - click on the Mannheim logo (MAN) after the game has finished - scroll down to the Live Statistik - click on Spielerstatistik
Thank you!
He played just 11:12. I thought he has more ice time.
I tried to ask him one too but he didnt respondAsked Pronman about Bordeleau’s start. Here’s what he said:
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
You
What’s your opinion on Bordeleau’a hot start? Hot streak or just that good? Corey Pronman
@anthony B. Skating still not great but skill and sense really have popped.
Kinda interesting he says that. There was that one guy from eliteprospects who felt that his skating improved a lot. But either way, he's still young and we know skating can improve. As long as he gets it to like the NHL baseline, who cares.Asked Pronman about Bordeleau’s start. Here’s what he said:
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
You
What’s your opinion on Bordeleau’a hot start? Hot streak or just that good? Corey Pronman
@anthony B. Skating still not great but skill and sense really have popped.
I mean, he doesn't look like a pylon. He looks faster than Pavs, which isn't saying much besides undersized players can succeed in the NHL with hard work and very good hockey IQ, which it looks like Bordeleau has.Kinda interesting he says that. There was that one guy from eliteprospects who felt that his skating improved a lot. But either way, he's still young and we know skating can improve. As long as he gets it to like the NHL baseline, who cares.
LaBanc certainly qualifies.Not that it means anything, but when's the last time that the resident underdog prospect that this subforum fell in love with actually turned into something more than a depth player?
Balcers may be on his way, and Carle can't count since he was from 2003...but outside of that..McGinn? If not him, then Ehrhoff unquestionably qualifies.
Its a mixed bag. We loved Chartier and Labanc almost equally and one is almost a top 6er and one is retired.Not that it means anything, but when's the last time that the resident underdog prospect that this subforum fell in love with actually turned into something more than a depth player?
Balcers may be on his way, and Carle can't count since he was from 2003...but outside of that..McGinn? If not him, then Ehrhoff unquestionably qualifies.
Its a mixed bag. We loved Chartier and Labanc almost equally and one is almost a top 6er and one is retired.
It's pretty close to our list. The only difference being Hatakka to Coe basically and theres an argument for that for sureIm not sure im sold on having Brinson over Spirdonov and Coe if its based on potential. Coe certainly has a very high upside and a strong chance at playing
LaBanc certainly qualifies.
Not that it means anything, but when's the last time that the resident underdog prospect that this subforum fell in love with actually turned into something more than a depth player?
Balcers may be on his way, and Carle can't count since he was from 2003...but outside of that..McGinn? If not him, then Ehrhoff unquestionably qualifies.
Would you really call a guy drafted top 40 an underdog? I'd venture a guess that SJ had Wiesblatt and Bordeleau pretty close to each other. I wouldn't be surprised if they had both top 25.