Prospect Info: Sharks Prospect Info Discussion Thread XVI

[Dr Quincy]

How has he been for you guys?

I'm following from afar and watching when I can. Limited opportunity and still building trust to get a better roll, but he has a knack for scoring goals.

 

[Lebanezer]

 

[TheWayToRefJose]

Getting Giroux vibes from this kid. Little undersized, boat loads of skill, and some snarl.

 

[Gecklund]

I like Raty, but doubt SJ takes a fin. Raty may not be top 10, so maybe if Sharks bubble.

Power, Hughes and Kent Johnson all look great if sharks mirror last season. Would be hard to pass on a Hughes brother, besides Luke is a much cooler name than Quinn or Jack so we'd have that. lols

Raty will be top 5 and probably top 3.

 

[Desert Eagle]

Hrabik and Raska both were returned in Czech second league.
Hrabik - 1 goal, 1 assist, 2nd line.
Raska - 1 assist, 4th line.
Bergmann - 1 goal (GWG), 2nd line.
Blichfeld - 1st line.
True - didn’t play.
Knyazev (VHL) - 1 SOG, “0”, 19:36, 1st pair.
Korenar - 23/30, team lost 6:7 (OT).

 

[The Lean Bergmann]

Hrabik and Raska both were returned in Czech second league.
Hrabik - 1 goal, 1 assist, 2nd line.
Raska - 1 assist, 4th line.
Bergmann - 1 goal (GWG), 2nd line.
Blichfeld - 1st line.
True - didn’t play.
Knyazev (VHL) - 1 SOG, “0”, 19:36, 1st pair.
Korenar - 23/30, team lost 6:7 (OT).

You can always check Lean's stats if you visit del.org - click on the Mannheim logo (MAN) after the game has finished - scroll down to the Live Statistik - click on Spielerstatistik

 

[Desert Eagle]

You can always check Lean's stats if you visit del.org - click on the Mannheim logo (MAN) after the game has finished - scroll down to the Live Statistik - click on Spielerstatistik

Thank you!
He played just 11:12. I thought he has more ice time.

 

[LadyStanley]

 

[Mayo8898]

Crazy stat Gushchin finished with a goal in a 10-6 loss where the opponent only scored one goal on the PP. He finished +3 while only being on the ice for one goal against (strictly scoreboard watching)

 

[The Lean Bergmann]

Thank you!
He played just 11:12. I thought he has more ice time.

The biggest factor is that the Adler played powerplay for 12 minutes.

For example. Lean had 17 shifts. Marc Michaelis (Canucks player) 18. But Michaelis played five more minutes because he's part of the powerplay unit.

 

[TheWayToRefJose]

Asked Pronman about Bordeleau’s start. Here’s what he said:

You What’s your opinion on Bordeleau’a hot start? Hot streak or just that good?

Corey Pronman @anthony B. Skating still not great but skill and sense really have popped.

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

 

[themelkman]

Asked Pronman about Bordeleau’s start. Here’s what he said:

You What’s your opinion on Bordeleau’a hot start? Hot streak or just that good?

Corey Pronman @anthony B. Skating still not great but skill and sense really have popped.

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

I tried to ask him one too but he didnt respond

 

[hohosaregood]

Asked Pronman about Bordeleau’s start. Here’s what he said:

You What’s your opinion on Bordeleau’a hot start? Hot streak or just that good?

Corey Pronman @anthony B. Skating still not great but skill and sense really have popped.

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

Kinda interesting he says that. There was that one guy from eliteprospects who felt that his skating improved a lot. But either way, he's still young and we know skating can improve. As long as he gets it to like the NHL baseline, who cares.

 

[TheWayToRefJose]

Kinda interesting he says that. There was that one guy from eliteprospects who felt that his skating improved a lot. But either way, he's still young and we know skating can improve. As long as he gets it to like the NHL baseline, who cares.

I mean, he doesn't look like a pylon. He looks faster than Pavs, which isn't saying much besides undersized players can succeed in the NHL with hard work and very good hockey IQ, which it looks like Bordeleau has.

 

[anthonyyy]

Definitely not a pylon. Straight-ahead speed, I don't think he'll be a burner, but he has very good edges and is agile enough to stickhandle and avoid people.

 

[OrrNumber4]

Not that it means anything, but when's the last time that the resident underdog prospect that this subforum fell in love with actually turned into something more than a depth player?

Balcers may be on his way, and Carle can't count since he was from 2003...but outside of that..McGinn? If not him, then Ehrhoff unquestionably qualifies.

 

[Sharksrule04]

SJ Sharks 2020-21 Top 15 Prospects: 11-15 - Teal Town USA

 

[TheWayToRefJose]

Not that it means anything, but when's the last time that the resident underdog prospect that this subforum fell in love with actually turned into something more than a depth player?

Balcers may be on his way, and Carle can't count since he was from 2003...but outside of that..McGinn? If not him, then Ehrhoff unquestionably qualifies.

LaBanc certainly qualifies.

 

[themelkman]

Not that it means anything, but when's the last time that the resident underdog prospect that this subforum fell in love with actually turned into something more than a depth player?

Balcers may be on his way, and Carle can't count since he was from 2003...but outside of that..McGinn? If not him, then Ehrhoff unquestionably qualifies.

Its a mixed bag. We loved Chartier and Labanc almost equally and one is almost a top 6er and one is retired.

 

[Cas]

Its a mixed bag. We loved Chartier and Labanc almost equally and one is almost a top 6er and one is retired.

Chartier did sign an AHL deal with Toronto this year. Might not turn into anything, but he's not retired yet.

 

[themelkman]

SJ Sharks 2020-21 Top 15 Prospects: 11-15 - Teal Town USA

Im not sure im sold on having Brinson over Spirdonov and Coe if its based on potential. Coe certainly has a very high upside and a strong chance at playing

 

[hohosaregood]

Im not sure im sold on having Brinson over Spirdonov and Coe if its based on potential. Coe certainly has a very high upside and a strong chance at playing

It's pretty close to our list. The only difference being Hatakka to Coe basically and theres an argument for that for sure

 

[OrrNumber4]

LaBanc certainly qualifies.

You're probably right. I guess I was looking for someone who was beloved right off the bat, like Bordeleau right now. The Labanc love, AFAICR, really started in his D+2 season. Then again, the same was true for Ehrhoff.

 

[matt trick]

Not that it means anything, but when's the last time that the resident underdog prospect that this subforum fell in love with actually turned into something more than a depth player?

Balcers may be on his way, and Carle can't count since he was from 2003...but outside of that..McGinn? If not him, then Ehrhoff unquestionably qualifies.

Would you really call a guy drafted top 40 an underdog? I'd venture a guess that SJ had Wiesblatt and Bordeleau pretty close to each other. I wouldn't be surprised if they had both top 25.

 

[OrrNumber4]

Would you really call a guy drafted top 40 an underdog? I'd venture a guess that SJ had Wiesblatt and Bordeleau pretty close to each other. I wouldn't be surprised if they had both top 25.

In the sense that he's not thought of as a top-100 prospect or anything. He's not Ryan Merkley or even Joshua Norris.