Idk, I think the lineup fits that criteria
The negativity in this thread is totally out of hand.
The Rangers are totally capable of dismantling the Habs defensive scheme. Yes, the Habs have a better team than the Bruins, but does anyone else remember the Rangers completely taking the Bruins apart earlier in the season?
The Habs offense sucks. Their D corps is mediocre. And even Carey Price can't stop a huge amount of high quality scoring chances.
The Rangers should win this series, no matter who plays on the 4th line.
I have faith that this team is ready to go for the playoffs. Whether it's Glass or Buch on the 4th line should be inconsequential. I understand that Glass makes it an offensive void, but Buch is wasted there.
Our top 9 needs to be the top 9. The 4th line will be sheltered and in fairness, Glass could be hidden and players like Nash, Zucc, Kreider, Miller, hell, even Fast could be double shifted to keep Glass on the bench in important situations.
This team is going to go as far as Henrik will take us. Our offense is better than Montreal's. Our defense is along the same lines as Montreal's. Can Lundqvist outplay Price? Or can he keep us in games until our offense can break through?
I have faith that this team is ready to go for the playoffs. Whether it's Glass or Buch on the 4th line should be inconsequential. I understand that Glass makes it an offensive void, but Buch is wasted there.
Our top 9 needs to be the top 9. The 4th line will be sheltered and in fairness, Glass could be hidden and players like Nash, Zucc, Kreider, Miller, hell, even Fast could be double shifted to keep Glass on the bench in important situations.
This team is going to go as far as Henrik will take us. Our offense is better than Montreal's. Our defense is along the same lines as Montreal's. Can Lundqvist outplay Price? Or can he keep us in games until our offense can break through?
Our defense is the worst in the playoffs.
You understand why AV put Glass in and then proceed to agree that Glass needs to be hidden?
Let me preface this that I wanted buch over glass but I think what he's saying that possibly in certain situations like late in close game we can double shift one of our top 9 guys in glass' place . Similar situation if buch was probably playing the same would go for him.
how is our defense close to as good as montreal's? they don't have two absolute anchors in their top-4.
Mostly downdates today.Any updates on the lines/pairings yet?
It makes no sense to have Glass then if we're going to double shift a top 9 guy in for him. Give the ice time to someone who's actually had a positive impact to the team at some point(Buch).
And I just lol at all the bad decisions AV made with the lineup. Put in Glass for Buch, put the worst Top 4 in the NHL back together. And the speculation for Glass over Buch was ability to work on the boards(and Glass isn't even good on the boards).
If you want a guy who is better at board battling than Buch, just move Vesey to the 4th line and then move up Buch. Or move Grabner to the 4th line. Grabner - Hayes - Miller and their "chemistry" is not even good. They don't have chemistry.
Let me preface this that I wanted buch over glass but I think what he's saying that possibly in certain situations like late in close game we can double shift one of our top 9 guys in glass' place . Similar situation if buch was probably playing the same would go for him.
I think you mean "AV will double shift Glass and put him out there when we're down a goal in the last 5 minutes of a game, or if we're leading by a goal in the last 5 minutes of a game and need to protect that lead."
The run officially begins today. Can't wait.
you...mean...you're...actually...excited....for...the...start...of...the...playoffs?
Did we lose 7-0 in game 1 or something?
There was more optimism in the 1930s stock market crash