The Duck Knight
Henry, you're our only hope!
doesn't he have a NMC? be tough to pawn him off to teams he's willing to go to
10 team NTC. So 20 teams he can be traded to without his consent.
doesn't he have a NMC? be tough to pawn him off to teams he's willing to go to
10 team NTC. So 20 teams he can be traded to without his consent.
I don't even think cap hit is the issue, the issue is salary. 12.5M over 2 years is poison to teams right now.Retain 1-2 million and add a 1st and he can be moved.
7 mil caphit for an 2nd isn't going to happen
You’ll hear it first here.. Fleury buyout then signs with Pitt for 2 years at 2.5-3m per.. not a fan boy, but that’s just what GMJR does
You should put in the sticky that the Hurricanes paid Marleau 3.83m because that was actual dollar cost. You’re right about the cap hit and that’s obviously why Toronto had to bribe someone to buy him out.What I'm about to say needs to be stickied
Marleau was in a unique situation, being a 35+ contract and a guy who was unwilling to play in Carolina. They would be on the hook for the full cap hit plus over $4.5m in real dollars. Not many teams would or could do that. Toronto was handcuffed. Fleury, if bought out, would be much more manageable for two years (~2.5m then ~3m).
Marleau does NOT set the market for dumping cap. Not even close
Since Marleau signed his contract after the age of 35, the Hurricanes will still absorb his full cap hit, paying him his $3 million signing bonus now and dividing his $833,333 salary over the next two seasons. He will not count against the team's cap in 2020-21.
Disagree look at his point totals and age.More interesting to me is RNH asking for $8...wow. He is not worth that at all.
It mattered outside of Toronto is what I was getting at. Whoever took him was taking on the full hit. That's where the value of the 1st came in.Marleau isn’t unique. 35+ doesn’t matter. Toronto needed cap space and couldn’t buy him out even if it wasn’t the 35+ cap rules. They needed to trade him. Carolina agreed to buy him out. They didn’t have to do that.
One yearcsp hit when you have space than 4 yrs of $3M+ of space.
An equivalent this year would be Stephan in AZ where he has high bonus and low salary so easy acquire and buy our for teams taking a cap hit this year
As stated before, Marleau cost a 1st for one year of a 6.25 cap hit and about 3.85m in real money for one year. Fleury is trash and will cost at least that seeing as he has an extra year and well, covid.
On what planet is a 36yo capable 1b goaltender comparable to a 40yo with a full NMC that has regressed to being a slow bottom 6 guy that can't produce with some of the best PP talent in the league and only wanted to play for 1 team?
More interesting to me is RNH asking for $8...wow. He is not worth that at all.
well they may not be totally comparable but one player had 1 year on his contract and the other has 2 at a higher cap hit during a pandemic with a flat cap. Looking at it Vegas would have to give up what Toronto did and possibly even more to move that cap hit even though fleury is the better player
At this point they both suck. Twist it how you want, but both are garbage and the second year at 7m in a flat cap negates any argument you have about Marleau. PM cost nothing but cash, MAF will cost his team more cash, for longer and will be a liability on the ice. you tell me what’s worseOn what planet is a 36yo capable 1b goaltender comparable to a 40yo with a full NMC that has regressed to being a slow bottom 6 guy that can't produce with some of the best PP talent in the league and only wanted to play for 1 team?
At this point they both suck. Twist it how you want, but both are garbage and the second year at 7m in a flat cap negates any argument you have about Marleau
Vegas has several options, including a 3rd team to retain salary or retaining salary themselves. At least a couple teams would take MAF at 4-5m, and unlike Marleau, he might be convinced to waive for any team that will give him the majority of starts. I'm sure when they told Captain Photoshop there were no takers for MAF+2nd they revised their no-trade priorities.
They're also trying to gear up to sign the premier UFA on Oct 9th after getting a new #1G for 5m. Toronto was desperately trying to free up cap to sign their own overpaid RFA. Not even remotely comparable situations.
yes Vegas can get a 3rd team involved but if they want petro I don’t see them being able to retain any of that contract. The third team is gonna ask for a 1st to retain 50% on fleury. Your gonna have a tough time moving him to teams who have cap space because those are the bottom feeders who fleury isn’t going to want to go to. You can make moves elsewhere but that’s going to weaken the team which hurts its cup chances. I don’t see Vegas getting petro without moving all of Fleury’s cap and giving up a 1st or more
Guerin's not hard up for cap space in 2020-21, but he seems to be carefully avoiding or shedding any commitments beyond that. He'll have a series of potentially expensive RFA extensions beyond next season, so even with moderate retention Fleury's cap hit carries some risk.Pietrangelo is still a Blue and may remain a Blue so any talk of spending a 1st to free up cap for him is purely hypothetical until Friday.
If they want to move him before then, well I look at the Wild with Flower's old SC winning teammate Bill Guerin, and the moves he's made, and they're not hard up for $ or cap space. I think he might take Flower at 5.5m with a little sweetener. So that only leaves 1.5m to be taken by a 3rd team. Staal (whether his 5.7m cap sticks or gets bought out for over 3m) only cost a 2nd to move.
So the question is do they do it now and if so for how much, or do they wait until Friday and risk Minnesota signing a UFA goalie?