Your daily dose of hope
Well this would explain the weird Stone deal, among other things
Your daily dose of hope
Didn’t the Rough Riders try that?
Well this would explain the weird Stone deal, among other things
Well this would explain the weird Stone deal, among other things
I don't think so, not that I remember. But communities could buy and maintain their local teams and facilities - if it works in the most captialist sports league in the world it can work anywhere.
Nonsense.
The only possible reason is that he doesn't want to be here.
Players won't sign until ownership change is official. Players are more likely to give a break to new ownership and stick it to Melnyk.I'd say the latter is a much stronger possibility. If an ownership change is coming up you'd think they'd make sure the core is signed long term, no?
I'd say the latter is a much stronger possibility. If an ownership change is coming up you'd think they'd make sure the core is signed long term, no?
Skim down to the post by PuempelsPurpose. Intriguing information, though inscrutable.
If the source is accurate, that would seem to confirm Melnyk is bringing in outside help rather than a full fledged sale. Which would obviously add another twist to the ongoing Karlsson saga.
Is this your interpretation of this post?:If the source is accurate, that would seem to confirm Melnyk is bringing in outside help rather than a full fledged sale. Which would obviously add another twist to the ongoing Karlsson saga.
Is this your interpretation of this post?:
I was speaking to a lawyer who I know does work for Melnyk, and I asked him about the rumors.
He said: "Melnyk has no interest in selling the team"
Has there been an offer for the team?
"We really can't discuss that."
Is John Ruddy involved?
"I couldn't tell you."
Okay, okay. Let's just talk hockey. Is Karlsson coming back?
"No clue, but I'd guess yes."
Do you think Karlsson relationship with Melnyk is reparable?
He smiles ever so slightly.
"Nope."
Or are you basing it on something else?
Your daily dose of hope
not if the money isn't there to pay lockout bonusesI'd say the latter is a much stronger possibility. If an ownership change is coming up you'd think they'd make sure the core is signed long term, no?
You actually think the Greenbergs have a good reputation?
Is this your interpretation of this post?:
I was speaking to a lawyer who I know does work for Melnyk, and I asked him about the rumors.
He said: "Melnyk has no interest in selling the team"
Has there been an offer for the team?
"We really can't discuss that."
Is John Ruddy involved?
"I couldn't tell you."
Okay, okay. Let's just talk hockey. Is Karlsson coming back?
"No clue, but I'd guess yes."
Do you think Karlsson relationship with Melnyk is reparable?
He smiles ever so slightly.
"Nope."
Or are you basing it on something else?
Interesting.Pretty much, more of a gut feeling based on the "not interested in selling but also no comment on offers that may or may not have occured" vibe.
Interesting.
I think the implication is that Karlsson will re-sign because Melnyk is gone.
You actually think that Shenkman, Ruddy and Greenberg are “crooked as they come...a dishonest and disgusting group” ?
Instead of you putting words in my mouth,why don’t we deal with the idiocy of what was said by ‘the insider’ lol
“crooked as they come...a dishonest and disgusting group”
The best part is him squaring the circle that those guys are disgusting criminals but his superhero is the Euge
We aren't asking for Mother Teresa to come in and buy the team, we are simply asking for an owner to invest in the franchise somewhat, don't embarrass or insult the fans, and try to retain the franchise players. We know majority of these rumored parties have done shady **** in their private businesses, we know they aren't some type of NGO or something. And we have no way of comparing owners as we have had the same owner the past 15 years. So I don't why the hell you and mysens get all bent out of shape when people are defending a potential new owner. We have no basis on whether they will be better or not, we just know that we can't stand the current owner and we need a change, whether the change will be good or even worse, we don't know because we aren't Nostradamus.
You didn' t answer my question, regardless of what @mysens said. Maybe he exaggerated , or has 1st hand knowledge.
What makes you think that the Greenbergs have a good reputation in the business world? Do you think that any of those individuals are much different than Melnyk? These people are all cut from the same cloth, whether you would like to admit it or not.