Craig Anderson isn't the elite goaltender some people make him out to be, but a decent starting goalie that hasn't won a thing in his career yet.
Always hovering around the same number of wins and losses. Shortened season and supposedly Vezina worthy 24 games stretch? 12 wins, 11 losses. Last year? 25 wins, 24 losses. This year? 14 wins, 20 losses.
Losses aren't directly on him, but he's no different than the rest of the team. Inconsistent, missing that next gear, not clutch enough, no killer instinct. As soon as the opposing team pushes or that things get tough, he, along with the rest of the team, usually falter. Won't shed a tear if he's traded. As hard as I try, no way I see Craig Anderson winning us 16 playoff games and lifting the cup when I close my eyes.
Roll with Lehner-Hammond, get as much as you can for Anderson. Blew the chance to roll with Bishop-Lehner when Anderson's value was at it's peak and saw something special in Conacher? There's your second chance.
You had 3 quality goaltenders at hand. A veteran that was playing out of his mind before going down and two youngsters that didn't miss the beat when they came in. Anderson's value was never going to be higher after that stretch and the drop off to Bishop-Lehner, if any, wasn't significant enough to justify keeping him and over sending a 25-26 years old starting goalie straight to a division rival for a lesser return. Really don't see the point of running with a soon to be 34 years old goaltender you know you won't be winning with when it's all said and done.