SAK11
Registered User
- Oct 4, 2011
- 1,632
- 640
I think Paul is very underrated. He is a only a year older than Perron and has outscored him. In Pauls 20 y.o season, he scored 17 its in 45 games and 5 in 24 in the NHL... Perron currently has 14 in 43. Why is Perron so clearly a tier ahead? Paul has 4 inches and 60 lbs on Perron, which, of course, has helped him adjust to the pro game, but its also a reason to favour him in the future if all else is equal. I think Paul has a very good chance at being a good 3rd liner, whereas Perron has an okay chance at being a 2nd liner.
You pretty much answered your own question, Perron has top 6 upside, Paul is destined to a bottom 6 role. A potential top 6 prospect will be held in higher regard, and rightfully so. Just look at their final junior seasons, Perron finished as the MVP of the Q, with [playoffs included] 53 goals and 141 points in 80 games, while Paul had 44 goals and 81 points in 73 games. Perron most definitely needs to get stronger so adapting to the pro game is tougher in that regard whereas Paul's size and strength are two of his best assets. Perron compares in some ways to a guy like Hoffman, and while it'll be tough to get to that level, it still leaves fans a lot more excited about a prospect like that versus a bottom 6 guy with much more limited offensive ability.