But it is true imo that Larsson had a greater positive effect than Hall just because we were starved for D, and that explains 2016-17. That does not mean it was a good trade but team needs are more important than total value if we are talking about getting wins in the short term
This is outside of the realm of the thread but its always shortsighted, and misguided to sacrifice longterm results for a short term gain. Hall, the player, and the contract were one of the best values in the game. PPG player longterm for 6M
The reality is we could be in cup contention with a platoon of McDrai, Nuge, and Hall in the stable, and maybe Eberle too. As you say with Sekera, Russell, Nurse, Klef we just needed one more D to work into the top 4 rotation.
Look how easily a D like Muzzin was acquired. Not much pain in that deal.
The trouble is its buyers remorse to get locked into one deal, one purchase, and not consider others. That happened with Chia in regards to Larsson and the rest is history.