KJ Dangler
Registered User
Just so we’re clear , this is Arizona’s backup goalie playing as well
Part of me wonders if he does that because the players get bent out of shape when called out for their poor play and he is trying to "protect" them.I’ve always been a fan of Torts but he owes some real answers in tonight’s post game presser. No more “I’m not gonna talk about it” routine.
Cheer yourself up by experiencing Meyer’s jewelers.....I might need to contact Elk & Elk for damages regarding this game.
Had a bad feeling ever since his camp interview. Was exceedingly cold and low-key pissed. Not good mindset or focus on game.Bobs contract is the only reason he's in net... 2-4 now with 3.9 GA and .87 SV%... Not good..
Management needs to find out what's going on with Bob, he's simply not good so far this season... On the road in SL then home vs a new and improved Sabre team on Saturday.... It could get ugly.
I might need to contact Elk & Elk for damages regarding this game.
f*** torts . Pretty soon that place will be empty. I would trade places with Colorado, or Arizona in a second, atleast they have young coaches that understand today’s game . Year after year , we put out a pedestrian group of forwards , play a slow boring style of hockey , why would fans show up for this .A few thoughts - and questions - about tonight's game:
*Tonight's 4-1 loss sure looked different than the Chicago 4-1 loss.
*Doesn't it seem we have a knack for making back-up netminders look like Vezina winners?
*Conversely, when is Bob going resemble someone who has held a Vezina?
*How the heck can we make the Yotes look like an offensive juggernaut?
*Us? Back to back one goal games.
*why is it so hard for Torts to use 4 lines? And does Sonny really deserve to have 6 minutes half way thru period 3?
*If Sedlak is a reason, when will a call up be made? (Yes, our issues are bigger than 4th line, but in my mind it's reflective of some behind the bench questions)
*One reason the assistants switched roles was for fresh voices. But is it the assistants the players have tuned out?
*Speaking of coaching, when is someone going to be held accountable for the PP?
*in summary, a horrible game from us.
I got off the Torts bandwagon after rolling 3 lines in a triple OT PO game. I can't wrap my mind around some of his decisions.**** torts . Pretty soon that place will be empty. I would trade places with Colorado, or Arizona in a second, atleast they have young coaches that understand today’s game . Year after year , we put out a pedestrian group of forwards , play a slow boring style of hockey , why would fans show up for this .
A lot of these questions could be asked in multiple years. The fact no progress seems to be made is disheartening.A few thoughts - and questions - about tonight's game:
*Tonight's 4-1 loss sure looked different than the Chicago 4-1 loss.
*Doesn't it seem we have a knack for making back-up netminders look like Vezina winners?
*Conversely, when is Bob going resemble someone who has held a Vezina?
*How the heck can we make the Yotes look like an offensive juggernaut?
*Us? Back to back one goal games.
*why is it so hard for Torts to use 4 lines? And does Sonny really deserve to have 6 minutes half way thru period 3?
*If Sedlak is a reason, when will a call up be made? (Yes, our issues are bigger than 4th line, but in my mind it's reflective of some behind the bench questions)
*One reason the assistants switched roles was for fresh voices. But is it the assistants the players have tuned out?
*Speaking of coaching, when is someone going to be held accountable for the PP?
*in summary, a horrible game from us.