- Apr 9, 2012
- 3,929
- 4,617
Cogs and Sherwood, although everything got jumbled up after Getz got hurt. Then they were just rotating the 3 centers through all 4 lines, and even used Street at center for one shift.Who was on his line, tonight?
Cogs and Sherwood, although everything got jumbled up after Getz got hurt. Then they were just rotating the 3 centers through all 4 lines, and even used Street at center for one shift.Who was on his line, tonight?
Like DVM mentioned the change from Aberg to Sherwood was night and day for that line.Who was on his line, tonight?
I thought that would work. Glad to see that Carlyle tried it. Steel has his issues, but none bigger than trying to create offense on a line with Aberg on it. Also, good on Sherwood for working his way up the lineup. He may prove to be a bigger steal by year's end if he keeps it up.Like DVM mentioned the change from Aberg to Sherwood was night and day for that line.
Played 20:54 in today's game without picking up a point. How did he look today and how did it compare as the game went on with his mins getting higher?
Easily. Just needs some time to get up to speed.What are your guys’ thoughts on this kid?
Still have the potential to be a top 6 forward?
Do you believe that he takes over Getzlaf as the top C in the future?Easily. Just needs some time to get up to speed.
I think he’s going to be too small to be a legitimate 1C. He’s not fast enough to overcome that IMO. Great hands and vision but he can be overmuscled too easily. Could be a great 2C or part of a 1a/1/b lineup I think though.Do you believe that he takes over Getzlaf as the top C in the future?
I think he’s going to be too small to be a legitimate 1C. He’s not fast enough to overcome that IMO. Great hands and vision but he can be overmuscled too easily. Could be a great 2C or part of a 1a/1/b lineup I think though.
I agree. I also think he could rack up a ton of pp points.I think he’s going to be too small to be a legitimate 1C. He’s not fast enough to overcome that IMO. Great hands and vision but he can be overmuscled too easily. Could be a great 2C or part of a 1a/1/b lineup I think though.
I mean if he can be his best giroux is a comparable
Why would he be known as a POS ? I dont get it. Forgive me as I'm not familiar with the ducks...He showed a lot more speed then I ever gave him credit for on that break away.
Love it tho, steel is just a very likable player... its a shame hes a duck and going to be known as a dirty POS.
Ive been wanting to get a Steel Gulls jersey.... /shrug now I guess I have too
Why would he be known as a POS ? I dont get it. Forgive me as I'm not familiar with the ducks...
The irony is the fanbases who mostly hate those players are the ones that have players that actually do dirty things and cause injuries.We are still trying to shake the label of being a team full of dirty players we had when we wo the cup in 2007. It doesn’t help that we are still employing Kesler and Perry who aren’t exactly well liked around the league.
Guess I missed it a bit but that kind of hockey appeals to some of us canadians. Those two guys are/were good players too. Mind you, Fans in calgary cant get enough of Tkachuck, but I hate the little stool pigeon..The irony is the fanbases who mostly hate those players are the ones that have players that actually do dirty things and cause injuries.