Player Discussion Sam Reinhart - Is he the real deal?

Panthaz89

Buffalo Sabres, Carolina Panthers fan
Dec 24, 2016
13,324
5,822
Buffalo,NY
Reinhart's side will be making the argument that supports their request.

Given the big contract the Sabres just gave to a winger that Reinhart will out-produce from a points POV last year and this year, I would expect that comparison would come up when it's time to talk contract.
This is silly Skinner scored 40 goals Sam is not going to hit 40 and probably not even 30...goals are a lot more valuable than assists especially come contract time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BananaSquad

Old Navy Goat

Registered User
Apr 24, 2003
11,424
7,159
Pattaya Thailand aka adult Disneyland
The problem with Nylander contract is the inflation of two years and the ufa years that Reinhart will get on a long term deal is a few more than Alex.
They'll have to adjust a bit as the latest rfa signings of note aren't really comparable ex Conner, Laine, Marner. It'll be interesting to see how it shakes out
 

explore

I was wrong about Don Granato and TNT
Jun 28, 2011
3,752
3,434
7or 8X6 ??

I think he's earned a William Nylander contract, at most. I think a long-term contract around $6-$7 million a year is fair. Reinhart at $8 million a year makes me imagine Dahlin's agent demanding and getting a McDavid contract after his entry-level contract ends.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BananaSquad

joshjull

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
78,697
40,446
Hamburg,NY
I think he's earned a William Nylander contract, at most. I think a long-term contract around $6-$7 million a year is fair. Reinhart at $8 million a year makes me imagine Dahlin's agent demanding and getting a McDavid contract after his entry-level contract ends.

There is no way Dahlin gets near McDavid money no matter what Sam gets.

Karlsson and Doughty are the two highest cap hit dmen at 11.5 and 11mil per respectively. Those are all UFA years. Dahlin isn’t likely to get that much after his ELC expires, let alone McDavid money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tatanka

BananaSquad

Registered User
Jun 13, 2013
4,779
1,700
Niagara
Like I feel like some of you go back and watch Kootenay Ice highlights and go ya 8m+ a year easy. Hes not that guy, he was drafted to be that guy, but he’s not. Honestly he’s a bit of bust (where we was picked and expected to be) and had become a fringe first line winger. Good player, not 8m + year good.
 

Chainshot

Give 'em Enough Rope
Sponsor
Feb 28, 2002
150,595
100,423
Tarnation
Like I feel like some of you go back and watch Kootenay Ice highlights and go ya 8m+ a year easy. Hes not that guy, he was drafted to be that guy, but he’s not. Honestly he’s a bit of bust (where we was picked and expected to be) and had become a fringe first line winger. Good player, not 8m + year good.

How is a 60-point player a bust again?
 

Jim Bob

RIP RJ
Feb 27, 2002
56,142
35,257
Rochester, NY
This is silly Skinner scored 40 goals Sam is not going to hit 40 and probably not even 30...goals are a lot more valuable than assists especially come contract time.

If you were Reinhart's agent, wouldn't you put the argument out there that makes the best case possible for the best contract possible for your client?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chainshot

Jim Bob

RIP RJ
Feb 27, 2002
56,142
35,257
Rochester, NY
There is no way Dahlin gets near McDavid money no matter what Sam gets.

Karlsson and Doughty are the two highest cap hit dmen at 11.5 and 11mil per respectively. Those are all UFA years. Dahlin isn’t likely to get that much after his ELC expires, let alone McDavid money.

Barring Dahlin waiting until after next season to talk extension and him going Norris Trophy finalist crazy next season, I would agree that it is unlikely that Dahlin's second contract blows past Eichel's $10M per.

If Dahlin does win the Norris next year, he might try and set a new bar for a second contract for a D...
 

Zip15

Registered User
Jun 3, 2009
28,121
5,401
Bodymore
I think he's earned a William Nylander contract, at most.

The Reinhart camp would agree. They'd say we will take the Nylander numbers through Sam's first two UFA years - which is when Nylander's deal ends - but now lets talk about Years 5-8 on a deal for Sam, which will be more expensive.

I think a long-term contract around $6-$7 million a year is fair. Reinhart at $8 million a year makes me imagine Dahlin's agent demanding and getting a McDavid contract after his entry-level contract ends.

He's not taking a long-term deal (i.e., 6-8 years) that starts with the number 6. And if the Sabres lowball him, he will take them to arbitration and that will likely mark the beginning of the end for Reinhart in Buffalo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aladyyn

Chainshot

Give 'em Enough Rope
Sponsor
Feb 28, 2002
150,595
100,423
Tarnation
Barring Dahlin waiting until after next season to talk extension and him going Norris Trophy finalist crazy next season, I would agree that it is unlikely that Dahlin's second contract blows past Eichel's $10M per.

If Dahlin does win the Norris next year, he might try and set a new bar for a second contract for a D...

Watch them bridge him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sabremike

kirby11

Registered User
Mar 16, 2011
9,807
4,690
Buffalo, NY
The Reinhart camp would agree. They'd say we will take the Nylander numbers through Sam's first two UFA years - which is when Nylander's deal ends - but now lets talk about Years 5-8 on a deal for Sam, which will be more expensive.



He's not taking a long-term deal (i.e., 6-8 years) that starts with the number 6. And if the Sabres lowball him, he will take them to arbitration and that will likely mark the beginning of the end for Reinhart in Buffalo.

The most frustrating part of this is the Sabres probably could have gotten Sam locked up long term at or around $6M and would finally have a cap friendly deal in place for a key guy, but Botts, in his infinite wisdom, decided to bridge him on his previous deal.
 

Duddy

Everyday is
Dec 24, 2005
12,048
1,371
The most frustrating part of this is the Sabres probably could have gotten Sam locked up long term at or around $6M and would finally have a cap friendly deal in place for a key guy, but Botts, in his infinite wisdom, decided to bridge him on his previous deal.
Yeah, but he is a bust, haven't you heard?? Botts is just the smrtst
 

sabrebuild

Registered User
Apr 21, 2014
10,517
2,770
Pittsburgh
The most frustrating part of this is the Sabres probably could have gotten Sam locked up long term at or around $6M and would finally have a cap friendly deal in place for a key guy, but Botts, in his infinite wisdom, decided to bridge him on his previous deal.

Who knows if thisvis remotely accurate, but Jeremy White had a frequently shown tweet that said Reinhart's camp was looking for 5.5 or so.

Could be bs, but it makes sense as a number considering what Nylander demanded with better counting stats and by all accounts outrageous demands.

I can't imagine Reinhart's agent asking for much over 6 longterm at that point.

Who knows.
 

Zman5778

Moderator
Oct 4, 2005
25,033
22,277
Cressona/Reading, PA
Watch them bridge him.

Given Botts' history with Sam.....I'm fully expecting a Dahlin bridge and then we get absolutely bent over after that.

Kinda like what's gonna happen with Sam, if we don't trade him first.


At least I never had this worry with Eichel -- Botts was never going to bridge Eichel. He was always an 8 year deal in the making. I'd like to have that confidence again.
 

Bendium

Registered User
Oct 18, 2019
1,904
1,487
Go to this link and just look at the names, ages, click on people and their stats. See where you think Sam fits on this list.

NHL Rankings

Nylander isn't a bad comparable stats wise, but as some have pointed out you have to take into account RFA vs UFA years you are buying. I was looking at Voracek's stats, career stat progression and age at signing and see some match. It was all UFA years, but also 3 years ago. He got an 8yr x 8.25 contract. Looking down the rest of the list I think anyone hoping for anything starting with a 6 is not playing in the real NHL salary world. Sam's progression and stats put him into the 7.5 to 8.5 range. Offer him 8 yr x 7.5 and sign him for anywhere in the 8.0 to 8.25 range. If you get an 8X8 you should be happy and call it a win.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sabremike

slip

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 19, 2005
16,137
4,686
Who knows if thisvis remotely accurate, but Jeremy White had a frequently shown tweet that said Reinhart's camp was looking for 5.5 or so.

Could be bs, but it makes sense as a number considering what Nylander demanded with better counting stats and by all accounts outrageous demands.

I can't imagine Reinhart's agent asking for much over 6 longterm at that point.

Who knows.
If Botts balked at that deal he’s an even greater fool than we suspect, and we already suspect he’s hands down the worst GM in Sabres history.
 

Zman5778

Moderator
Oct 4, 2005
25,033
22,277
Cressona/Reading, PA
If Botts balked at that deal he’s an even greater fool than we suspect, and we already suspect he’s hands down the worst GM in Sabres history.

I dunno........Scotty Bowman was pretty darned awful as GM here. Good coach. Very poor GM........though his issues were very different than Botts' issues.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chainshot

sabrebuild

Registered User
Apr 21, 2014
10,517
2,770
Pittsburgh
If Botts balked at that deal he’s an even greater fool than we suspect, and we already suspect he’s hands down the worst GM in Sabres history.

Oh I don't know about worst in team history. But certainly not ready to have steered the team when he got here.

Who knows what really happened, but I play the most likely options from either side. If you want to defend botts, you say Reinhart wanted to bet on himself. If you want good players on low caps for team success, you think Botts didn't trust Reinhart with a longterm deal.

The bridge deal is usually only a wise decision when a good team needs to create time for cap space. So a bridge could not have been to create space to keep the contending going.

And we know they agreed to 3.5 or so. So even on the bridge, he took a decent size number, a number high enough that there were not huge savings over the course of the bridge anyway.

Which leads me to believe that Botts really thought it was a good idea for Reinhart to prove himself, after three years, only 4 after being drafted and with no season under .5 ppg, two 20+ goal seasons and literally no one on the team to supplant his role on the team.

As I said before, there was basically no way short of injury for Reinhart to not improve his counting stats when they made this deal. He was gonna play the whole year with Eichel, he had always shown steady improvement and was coming off a 40 game stretch of ppg play.

The O'Reilly trade was dumb, the mitts and tage stuff was dumb, Housley for year two was dumb, but for my money the bridge deal for Reinhart is unimpeachably stupid. I'm not talking about the wing nuts who can't get over their hate for other posters or belief that they were entitled to the best possible outcome of a 2 overall pick.

If you rationally work thru every likely outcome, the position of the team, the role of the player and the player's history and decide, nope I can't give this player 6x7 or around that, the only conclusion I can make is you are unable to do this job.
 

SwedishFire

Registered User
Mar 3, 2011
5,332
1,863
Reinhart will be a player that one year has that 40 goals, some have thought. But he will never be the player the franchise drafted him to be. He is the great complimentary player, but has some have said. He will never drive his own line. Why it is like this, I dont know. To many eat the words of the Jumbo Dumbo Craig Button, the superintelligent Einstein hockeyplayer, who beat you with his mind. Well, that was maybe cause what he just only had, that was elite. Skating and shooting is not.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad