Gurglesons
Registered User
To no small extent because they've refused to learn the lessons from who he was here. Bonino in a top 6 style role here was a productive player. Bonino in a bottom 6 style role with bad zone starts was defensively decent (and often very good) but mediocre for production. It was very Jekyll and Hyde.
You wash your mouth out.
Hornqvist is a rarer player type (elite net presences are very rare), more important to the power play, a better 5v5 player (only 2-3 points behind this season while adding a lot more) and stronger in terms of raising team intensity.
He is currently our most difficult to replace wing for next season.
*shrugs* Sheahan performed as well as anybody else we've had recently in a hard defensive 3C role so I'm okay with that. If you have to spend more and shave it off the wings, then okay, sure. But the difference between a 4m 3C and a 2m 3C isn't likely to be that big that I would. Only time it might be is if/when Sid/Geno go down.
More like 20 ish points when buried in the Dzone than 30 ish. If it had been 30 ish I think he'd still be here. He put up a bunch of points when in the top 6.
Similar to how Cullen's pace in 16-17 on the 4th line was 22 points and his pace when away from it was 51.
Bonino produced at a 27 pt pace in the 2017 playoffs. Currently producing at a 35 point pace playing insane zone starts in Nash (granted Turris went down.)
Bonino is relatively consistent no matter his role. And should honestly be the archetype of player we are replacing Brassard with.