Ahh, Evan. The "it's not your money" fallacy.
No, it's not my money. But it is the money that my favorite team uses to build a competitive roster. And if the choice is between throwing ridiculous gobs of cash at a guy that might not (read: probably won't) end up being worth all of it by contract's end or spending it smartly on incremental upgrades and deals less likely to blow up in the team's face, I know what choice I'm going to make. That's why I "make up" analytical tools that tell you that, shock of shocks, it's probably a better investment to get your high end star players while they're on controllable pre-FA deals instead of paying like $10m+ per unit of fWAR on the open market where players have all the advantage because you can pit teams against one another.
But, please, do go on about how mew-hew-hew the evil mean numbers people are making things soooo hard on you.
Also, when you look at it, yes it is my money. Revenue generation in baseball is, at the end of the day, no matter the particular stream, all about the fans. Fans pay for tickets. Fans buy merch. fans watch broadcasts that drive advertising money that spin into TV deals. Fans drive player popularity which creates awareness/celebrity that cause endorsement deals to be viable. Everything trickles down from the fans no matter what. I may not be paying the contract directly, but it's grossly disingenuous to try and pretend that I shouldn't care how my team spends its limited resources just because you think you "deserve" to hvave you and your buddies given whatever you feel is owed to you no matter what.