darko
Registered User
- Feb 16, 2009
- 70,269
- 7,797
The Rangers lack a #1 center and #1 D. You usually need at least one or both of those elements to win.
McDonagh.
As half a dozen people already pointed out.
The Rangers lack a #1 center and #1 D. You usually need at least one or both of those elements to win.
Regarding Marc Staal - he is signed long term to a pretty large contract - is a team trading for him doing the Rangers a favour (cap dump) or is he still a good shut down Dman?
Arizona really needs to add a couple top 4 dmen. They have stated they want to do so with the intention of competing right away.
What would you expect in return in a trade?
Wasn't that LA - who went bye-bye in the 1st round?
I'll bite. Why, aside from Hayes having a bad year, do they have to bring in a legitimate center to replace Brassard?
I don't think it was a 1C vs 1C situation in that final... I think it was more of their centers were better down the entire lineup. Remember to consider what year were talking here
Stepan vs kopitar
Brassard vs Jeff carter
Brad vs mike Richards
Moore vs stoll
seriously.. The only one of those match ups that I think we were even or better is the fourth line...
Having stamkos still doesn't change the fact the Kings were better at 2c and 3c hell I don't think Crosby or malkin would have us win that series
How did Krieder and Hayes make it into this category?I have nothing to say. If you don't think moving Lundqvist, Nash, Staal, Girardi, Kreider, Hayes, etc. isn't blowing it up then idk...
We're still convinced center is the problem? Really?
We're never going to get it, are we?
Hows that going for Ovechkin and the Caps?
That group is the biggest bunch of losers in the NHL and in the top 5 of every professional sport in North America.
It was Pittsburgh since the coaching change.
That group is the biggest bunch of losers in the NHL and in the top 5 of every professional sport in North America.
Yes, but that isn't what you said.
"Best possession team in the league wins the Cup again. Not rocket science."
LA was.
The Rangers actually somehow lead the league in PDO. Still trying to figure out how that's possible.
Yes, but that isn't what you said.
"Best possession team in the league wins the Cup again. Not rocket science."
LA was.
The Rangers actually somehow lead the league in PDO. Still trying to figure out how that's possible.
I agree but your making my point to some degree. You take away 1 of our top 2 and without a replacement it dilutes the position. At best to me Hayes is a 3rd line center. Yes I know every team may not have the depth the LA team had at this position but there are a number of teams in the East that have at least 2 quality centers.
Because we really haven't had a top line center. Both Stepan and Brassard IMO are more 2nd line centers. Now you remove one and insert Hayes who at this point has shown nothing more than being a third line center and you have diluted the position. Having a bad year is one thing. Having a bad year because you came in out of shape to me is more concerting. He should be young and eager. Also he made an awful lot of dumb mistakes. IMO I also think he is a step too slow to be a 1 or 2 line center.
McDonagh.
As half a dozen people already pointed out.
That group is the biggest bunch of losers in the NHL and in the top 5 of every professional sport in North America.
I agree there but you don't need a Crosby-type to win the Cup.
Previous Rangers teams had depth. 15/16 team didn't. Depth and lack of puck movement on the back end.