CBJWerenski8
Formerly CBJWennberg10 (RIP Kivi)
- Jun 13, 2009
- 42,370
- 24,288
Actually, to improve on this point...I like this signing.
Still need more bodies, but the four regulars we lost totaled 50 points for us last season. Nash had 41 on his own.
He's always worn #20 in his NHL career. Unless I am very forgetful we haven't had a #20 since Tim Erixon and Kristian Huselius before him. So, I assume Nash will be #20 for us too.
He's always worn #20 in his NHL career. Unless I am very forgetful we haven't had a #20 since Tim Erixon and Kristian Huselius before him. So, I assume Nash will be #20 for us too.
Yeah but you see plahing Jenner or Foligno at center kills our winger depth. The point of the move is to keep them on the wings. Jenner or Foligno can roll on Wennbergs wing and take draws whenever he struggles and then play wing after the draw.Other than last years outlier numbers, Nash doesn’t convince me he can outscore Dubi. Whoopee! I’m not convinced he brings more to the table than Figs or Jenner playing center, something I’d prefer not to see. But I’m sure that he’s cheap is his positive, but that doesn’t make him good. Put me down as on the signing.
Or 16, just to mess with people.Well as someone on the main board pointed out, he should wear 61 so all those old jerseys we bought over the years are semi-current again.
Or 16, just to mess with people.
There was this dude named Saad who wore #20
Not the R Nash I really wanted but a fine R Nash none the less. A late blooming 3rd liner at a very very reasonable contract.
And how many times will Rimer call him "Rick Nash" next season? 30,000 is my guess.
I can insure you it will. (Misspelling intentional!)Let's all hope this works out better than the last time we signed a bottom six center from the Bruins.
I can insure you it will. (Misspelling intentional!)