Friedman: Rangers listening on Alexandar Georgiev

A1LeafNation

Obsession beats talent everytime!!
Oct 17, 2010
27,406
17,353
Rangers probably desperate to trade Gorgiev.

Their third string will probably bolt to the KHL if he not in the NHL this year.
 

Calad

Section 422
Jul 24, 2011
4,041
2,601
Long Island
Can’t believe this guy isn’t traded. What are the Rangers brass holding out for?

Why are they in a Rush to trade him? Shesterkin certainly has a lot of talent but they aren't going to put all their eggs in one basket, especially a basket that has 3 NHL games.

And so we are at this crossroads; Gorton and co see Georgiev as a serious contender for the starter role after Hank retires, so to trade him away to a team who values him as a backup and will only pay the value of a backup makes no sense. Better off holding out until a team views Georgiev the same way they do.
 

Gary Nylund

Registered User
Oct 10, 2013
30,002
22,341
Off the top of my head:

This season - Arizona Coyotes: Raanta/Kuemper/Comrie (Comrie eventually traded in December)

Other top of my head examples:

16/17 Islanders - Halak/Greiss/Berube (Halak waived and sent to AHL at some point before finishing year in NHL IIRC)
15/16 Wild - Dubnyk/Kuemper/Backstrom (Backstrom moved at deadline)
06/07 Red Wings - Hasek/Osgood/MacDonald (McDonald waived and lost to Boston shortly before trade deadline)
03/04 Red Wings - Hasek/Joseph/Legace (Wings tried to move Joseph but couldn't, both Joseph/Hasek on and off IR till Hasek got shutdown)
98/99 Red Wings - Osgood/Maracle/Hodson until TDL and then Osgood/Ranford/Maracle (Hodson got beat for #2 job but Holland wouldn't trade him for less than a 3rd until he went to Tampa in the Wendel Clark deal. Ranford came in as vet insurance and because the Wings kinda already knew Maracle was going to Atlanta)
96/97 Red Wings - Osgood/Vernon/Hodson (Everyone in front office not named Bowman hated Vernon and had already chosen Hodson as Osgood eventual back up but didn't want to lose him on waivers. They sent him on a couple AHL conditioning stints during the year)

Thanks for the info. So based on that I guess it's fair to say that starting the season with 3 goalies rarely happens, every 4 years or so there's one team that does it. And keeping them all season hasn't happened in the last 20 years.

Yeah I think it's safe to say NY would like to have this resolved before the next season starts.
 

Aceboogie

Registered User
Aug 25, 2012
32,649
3,896
The market for these type of goalies is set. Hell get a 2nd + 3rd and maybe a B- level prospect.

Check what Talbot/Andersen/Bernier/Scrivens/Fasth got. Most (or all) were around the 70-150 NHL game mark, little starter time, but good numbers as a backup/psuedo starter for period. Unproven at time of trade

Solid guy to target in a trade, but return will be small
 

AirGut

Registered User
Jul 1, 2019
1,835
2,385
Larry Brooks Bus Stop
www.capfriendly.com
you're clueless about the Leafs.

Since Keefe took over they've been relying on Hutchinson way more than Babcock ever did. Babcock only played the backup on the back of b2bs, Hutchinson is getting random games here and there.

If you think the reason Andersen is suffering right now is because of load, you're mistaken.

Goalies are allowed to have off weeks, it's just the waves of the season and he's been tremendous all season except for recently. I have zero worries about our starting goaltending position. Just the backup, which can be upgraded in way more ways than losing a player of Kapanens ill (who is a great 3rd liner btw) we can either roll with Hutchinson (who's been way better since Keefe has taken over) or trade for somebody who will come way cheaper.

But please tell me more about how WE MUST trade for Gorgiev to solidify our backup position :laugh:
Guy this isn't about the now, it's about 2 years from now when Andersen leaves the Leafs and they can't pay him. They're gonna desperately need someone to get a starting job and Georgiev could provide that even now to certain teams. And trust me they aren't getting Bilyalov and he wouldn't magically be as good as Georgiev is either. The Leafs are heading into some very odd times, but I guess that's what happens when you pay 3 players 10+
 
  • Like
Reactions: egelband

TGWL

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 28, 2011
15,096
9,875
Rangers probably desperate to trade Gorgiev.

Their third string will probably bolt to the KHL if he not in the NHL this year.
I mean,
1) He can't right now.
2) He was in the NHL and just got sent down for the all star break.
 
  • Like
Reactions: egelband

Kelly

Registered User
Nov 12, 2012
14,894
7,472
Guy this isn't about the now, it's about 2 years from now when Andersen leaves the Leafs and they can't pay him. They're gonna desperately need someone to get a starting job and Georgiev could provide that even now to certain teams. And trust me they aren't getting Bilyalov and he wouldn't magically be as good as Georgiev is either. The Leafs are heading into some very odd times, but I guess that's what happens when you pay 3 players 10+
......um okay, then why was your last post all about this season :laugh::laugh:

Georgiev hasnt proved he's capable of playing a starters load, so you're not getting that type of value for him.

Andersen got a 1st + 2nd and was way more proven, think we'll see Georgiev go for something like 2nd + B prospect -- seems like fair value for a goalie like him.
 

Chardo

Registered User
Apr 27, 2007
11,301
7,618
Someone might be dumb enough to trade significant assets for him. Goalies are a dime a dozen. Teams are foolish to overspend for one, in assets and salary.
 

AirGut

Registered User
Jul 1, 2019
1,835
2,385
Larry Brooks Bus Stop
www.capfriendly.com
......um okay, then why was your last post all about this season :laugh::laugh:

Georgiev hasnt proved he's capable of playing a starters load, so you're not getting that type of value for him.

Andersen got a 1st + 2nd and was way more proven, think we'll see Georgiev go for something like 2nd + B prospect -- seems like fair value for a goalie like him.
Well we're definitely not taking garbage tier trash in the form of a certain person named Jermey. If the Leafs won't pay up for Alex so be it we'll just move on to SJS and Labanc
 

Leaf Fans

Registered User
Sep 29, 2017
19,939
8,426
Well we're definitely not taking garbage tier trash in the form of a certain person named Jermey. If the Leafs won't pay up for Alex so be it we'll just move on to SJS and Labanc
The Rangers aren't dealing exclusively with the Leafs. They are going to trade him for what they consider the best offer if they trade him at all. There is no moving on from one team to another.
 

bl02

Registered User
Jan 13, 2014
32,243
22,271
In fact Gorton would probably prefer to trade him to the West. I guess looking at the Standings the Sharks are looking out of the playoff race so not sure what other western Team is in need of a goalie (present and future)??? Flames?
 
  • Like
Reactions: egelband

Kelly

Registered User
Nov 12, 2012
14,894
7,472
Well we're definitely not taking garbage tier trash in the form of a certain person named Jermey. If the Leafs won't pay up for Alex so be it we'll just move on to SJS and Labanc
Do Shark fans get a say?

Lablanc.... Come on.

That's worse than Kapanen.
 

Quinnisinoverhishead

Registered User
Oct 4, 2014
626
538
Why are they in a Rush to trade him? Shesterkin certainly has a lot of talent but they aren't going to put all their eggs in one basket, especially a basket that has 3 NHL games.

And so we are at this crossroads; Gorton and co see Georgiev as a serious contender for the starter role after Hank retires, so to trade him away to a team who values him as a backup and will only pay the value of a backup makes no sense. Better off holding out until a team views Georgiev the same way they do.
How is holding on to him a good thing? We can not go forward for the next year and a half with three goalies. That is asinine. Look at what we got for Talbot. Georgiev today is worth less than Talbot was at that point in time. Trade him for a 2nd and get Shesty developing in the NHL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pavel Buchnevich

bigdog16

Registered User
Nov 7, 2013
4,356
4,282
USA
The market for these type of goalies is set. Hell get a 2nd + 3rd and maybe a B- level prospect.

Check what Talbot/Andersen/Bernier/Scrivens/Fasth got. Most (or all) were around the 70-150 NHL game mark, little starter time, but good numbers as a backup/psuedo starter for period. Unproven at time of trade

Solid guy to target in a trade, but return will be small

Again none of those goalies were even close to 23 years old when they were traded
 

A1LeafNation

Obsession beats talent everytime!!
Oct 17, 2010
27,406
17,353
Why are they in a Rush to trade him? Shesterkin certainly has a lot of talent but they aren't going to put all their eggs in one basket, especially a basket that has 3 NHL games.

And so we are at this crossroads; Gorton and co see Georgiev as a serious contender for the starter role after Hank retires, so to trade him away to a team who values him as a backup and will only pay the value of a backup makes no sense. Better off holding out until a team views Georgiev the same way they do.
A couple of their young guys already went home.

They are desperate for this one not to do the same.
 

RickChartraw

Registered User
Oct 12, 2018
3,401
3,994
Bracco + 2nd, move on. Leafs aren't winning a cup with Georgiev anyways but he's probably worth more than that. Leafs should spend some assets on D.
 

bbny

Unregistered User
Apr 12, 2019
2,166
3,540
A deal like Georgiev/Fast for Kapanen/4th seems like the right kind of fit for both teams. It is unclear if the Rangers will want to re-sign Fast as he will be a UFA this summer. He seems like the right missing piece here to help fill the void left by Kapanen on the 3rd line for the rest of this season. He's got a lot of playoff experience, excellent penalty killer, can chip in with some offense here and there, and plays with the kind of energy and passion that is worth a lot come playoff time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: egelband

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad