you run the goalie, you arent afforded normal protections. Same ways if you run a guy in the numbers, even if you didnt mean to and dont want to fight, your right to refuse is revoked. best example, fleischman run gorges from behind and answers to white.
So you expect the world's best goalie, after being run, to stand up and challenge palmeri to a fight ? In what freaking world ? again for all of the pearl clutching you should be thanking your lucky stars that 6 wasnt on the ice because he too would have been 100% justified at going with palmeri whether he wanted or not.
and which of those shots to the back is causing you such consternation when the person who actually got punched in the back doesnt have a problem with it ? Why are you feigning more offense than the aggreived over a nothing play ?
1. Are you even reading my posts?
2. I'm not a Devils fan.
3. I agree that if you run someone whether goalie or not, that player should face repercussions.
4. I
NEVER stated Price should have gone up to Palmieri and challenge him to a fight.
5. To the bolded, all of it. What I have a problem with, like I have stated multiple times in this thread replying to your posts,
IS NOT SOME FORM OF RETALIATION FROM PRICE, it is
Price throwing blindside punches at a player laying on the ice without any way of protecting himself. In fact, I might not even have a problem with it because I don't really care if Price got suspended or not, I just think it was a cowardly move.
6. I don't care if Palmieri doesn't care what happened, he isn't my mother.