Right, but if you look at it on the balance, it was always likely for Arsenal to drop points against Liverpool. Going up early in a match doesn't change that equation.The thing is is that’s it’s much more unlikely to lose a game from a winning scoreline than it is from an neutral scoreline, so it’s not that’s it’s trying to emphasize that going up on Liverpool was a bad thing, but that losing the points from a situation where it’s less likely to lose points is a bad thing. Particularly if it happens to you more frequently than it does to any other team.
Bullshit. The way the facts are presented mattersIt’s from Optus Sport. I highly doubt it’s incorrect. Something that is fact cannot be a hot take.
Ya, but I don’t think the 3 points lost to Liverpool in that situation are meant to be the focus any more or any less than the other 15 pts being referenced.Right, but if you look at it on the balance, it was always likely for Arsenal to drop points against Liverpool. Going up early in a match doesn't change that equation.
Bullshit. The way the facts are presented matters
Yeah, but that’s 1/6th of the fact and I don’t know what the other ones off the top of my head. It’s a stat lacking context.Ya, but I don’t think the 3 points lost to Liverpool in that situation are meant to be the focus any more or any less than the other 15 pts being referenced.
As to your second point, I may be missing something very simple, but what exactly about the way it’s presented makes it more of a hot take than it makes it factual?
Yeah no to this. I am not targeting you at all, but just because somebody claims "FACTS" doesn't really understand the reason why those facts are facts in the first place. There is a reasonable explanation for everything bruv, the sky is blue and that's a fact, but why is the sky blue? Because air molecules scatter light from the sun and because blue is a shorter wavelength than the others, it gets scattered readily and easier than the other colours - there's your reason. Arteta dropping points is a fact, but you need to realise is that majority of those points dropped were last season when he just came into the team.It’s from Optus Sport. I highly doubt it’s incorrect. Something that is fact cannot be a hot take.
People just love to throw the word bottler around. Lost its meaning to me because it’s so overused within its contextYeah, but that’s 1/6th of the fact and I don’t know what the other ones off the top of my head. It’s a stat lacking context.
because of the narrative it drives that arteta is somehow a bottler.
Wow he played them like a fiddle. Great agent.
van de Beek’s agent already upset at playing time? That might be a record.
I can’t tell from the interview if it’s actually upset or just typical “my guy should play more” agent talk.
If it’s the former than the agent should have probably checked which team he was going to. He wasn’t going to be a regular starter for United as long as Pogba and Bruno are there. Cup canes and sub appearances are what he should expect.
I think it's backing his guy. But I don't know that you spend that much on a guy who's not going to be a regular starter. If that means OGS had to figure a way to integrate and change the system, so be it, but even United aren't rich enough to not get the guy into the majority of matches.
I think it fits here, though, no?People just love to throw the word bottler around. Lost its meaning to me because it’s so overused within its context
Short of fully switching the system to a 4-4-2, I'm not sure what else OGS is supposed to do to get VdB higher up the pecking order. He's clearly behind Bruno for the #10 role and Pogba as the more free of the other two midfielders and his skill set doesn't really fit playing the more defensive role. I think he was bought as the Pogba replacement a year early.
VDB has been awesome every time he's been on as well. It's wild to see so much off the ball movement outside of Rashford.He should be playing over Pogba right now. Pogba clearly isn't right after Covid. He's been awful.
He should be playing over Pogba right now. Pogba clearly isn't right after Covid. He's been awful.
It’s two league games in. It’s not like VdB has been riding the bench for 3 months.
Pogba was clearly going to start the first game. VdB came on with 25 mins left or whatever. Then he played the full game midweek so it makes sense for Pogba to start again. VdB will likely get the full game today as well so Pogba will likely start Sunday too.
Sure if it’s November, Pogba still sucks, and VdB is still stapled to the bench, he should be pissed, but we’re not remotely there yet.
I mean Pogba has had some awful stretches pre-COVID; I think that it's a bit early to look to lay the blame there when pretty much every other player that had COVID has been completely fine (some even playing better than before ala CHO).He should be playing over Pogba right now. Pogba clearly isn't right after Covid. He's been awful.
I mean Pogba has had some awful stretches pre-COVID; I think that it's a bit early to look to lay the blame there when pretty much every other player that had COVID has been completely fine (some even playing better than before ala CHO).
I mean Pogba has had some awful stretches pre-COVID; I think that it's a bit early to look to lay the blame there when pretty much every other player that had COVID has been completely fine (some even playing better than before ala CHO).