That's a dangerous argument man. Take a step back and think about what you are proposing. You want these people, no matter how few, to cut people that really need and are you know... facing DEATH, so you can watch hockey?
Just think of yourself 10 years in the future and looking back thinking that you are on the right side of this debate. This is a game and this is literally life and death. You have to be one incredibly selfish person to think that endangered communities should be put on the back burner so hockey can continue. Would you make that choice for your own family member? As in, if your grandma was in line to get the vaccine, and then a bus of the San Jose Sharks and all their employees come up and take all the doses. You'd look at your grandma with a smile and say... we get to watch them play the Kings tonight so that's great.
Again, in the US, people who you say are facing death are already on lists if they apply usually.
Secondly, the NHL is not exactly stealing doses from the US. The US is administering more than 1 M doses a day now and it's more about distributing them out rather than a lack of vaccines like Canada. If the NHL gets them from Pfizer directly, they aren't stealing vaccines from old people.
Secondly, NHL players are traveling and putting a bunch of other people at risk. So either the league can shut down and not have players travel (which any pragmatist knows is not going to happen) OR they can actually give the vaccines to their players and staff which is traveling around the country spreading the virus.
I would have agreed with your point back in December and I still kinda do for Canada but we're in a situation now where the US has been getting these vaccines to the elderly and to hospital workers with lots more supply coming in.