To be fair, you just proved the guy's point.
It's a subjective discussion.
Zero, by definition, each one of your elements are subjective. To my point you and I could disagree on every single one.
The only thing irrefutable is wins and losses.
And the losses are tragically piling up.
it's not as subjective as either of you are suggesting but i'll grant you there is some leeway. subjectivity associated with judgments such as this have an inverse correlation with experience. make no mistake, people inside the game (tallon, for example) know when a team *should* be competing and playing with structure and isn't.
what we're watching now is a bunch of young guys being thrown together from different development systems, at different levels of development, etc. with no time to learn each other's tendencies or the overall scheme. this is garbage time. you would expect that a good coach would get any group to play with some cohesion given some time but it's just silly to expect that right now.
i'm on record with regard to our former coaches. as a reminder, i've said that dineen won't ever be a successful head coach in the NHL. i don't think he'll ever get another opportunity period, but you never know with garth snow out there. he's certainly way beneath any of the retreads out there and any of the up and comings in any GM's eyes. in any event, he won't ever inherit a winning situation or a situation that can be turned around with coaching. why do i say these things? i'm making less subjective judgments than you think. (perhaps it helps that i'm also not emotionally invested in the team's day to day Ws and Ls... at least not right now). i know many of you feel *very* differently. let's see how things turn out but as a teaser, if there's no semblance of objectivity in any of the measures i've proffered and i'm right... what happened?