And then never use them there or what?Literally the only reason Sullivan is a fan of the acquisition.
Sullivan probably asks prospective applicants whether they can PK when looking for a new housekeeper.
Couldn’t you bring him back if they bought out Granlund? I don’t want Zucker back necessarily, but it seems like you could re-sign him if Granlund wasn’t a thing. I’m still surprised Dubas hasn’t bought him out yet.I'm against using ~5M players on L3 full time, unless you're using a balanced approach and have a cheaper winger in the top 6.
Especially if we're talking about how Sullivan uses L3...you're just not gonna produce much like that.
Bringing Zucker back is a luxury we can't afford now. Let him go. Use that money to address the actual holes.
His reaction to the buyout question has me thinking he has a Granlund for a bag of pucks trade in the works. Just wonder how much net cap space we'd gain in such a deal.Couldn’t you bring him back if they bought out Granlund? I don’t want Zucker back necessarily, but it seems like you could re-sign him if Granlund wasn’t a thing. I’m still surprised Dubas hasn’t bought him out yet.
You could, but then you're paying someone ~5 mill to be an L3 winger, with sub-optimal usage to produce scoring. Someone would have that spot at any given time, besides when top 6 wings are hurt.Couldn’t you bring him back if they bought out Granlund? I don’t want Zucker back necessarily, but it seems like you could re-sign him if Granlund wasn’t a thing. I’m still surprised Dubas hasn’t bought him out yet.
Our GMs have been killing us since 2017. Death by a thousand bad decisions. (Not Dubas…yet)Nothing matters if we die tomorrow.
Vegas fan checking in merely to offer hearty congratulations on getting a very solid 200' player who has a couple of good years left, and for peanuts. Our cap pain is your tangible gain.
Vegas fan checking in merely to offer hearty congratulations on getting a very solid 200' player who has a couple of good years left, and for peanuts. Our cap pain is your tangible gain.
I think it worked pretty well for both teams.
This allowed Vegas to re-up Barbashev at what I think is at least a fair deal. Probably closer to outright good deal. Especially considering his playoffs.
Suffice it to say that while Vegas fans are sad to lose Reilly, we're at least happy that he didn't go to a team within the Western Conference. Have seen way too many games where low-key Reilly Smith turned out to be the difference maker.
I think it worked pretty well for both teams.
This allowed Vegas to re-up Barbashev at what I think is at least a fair deal. Probably closer to outright good deal. Especially considering his playoffs.
Why would you want to bring back a player that beyond last season was riddled with injuries in his time here? No thanks, good player but too injury prone.Couldn’t you bring him back if they bought out Granlund? I don’t want Zucker back necessarily, but it seems like you could re-sign him if Granlund wasn’t a thing. I’m still surprised Dubas hasn’t bought him out yet.
I don’t want him back.Why would you want to bring back a player that beyond last season was riddled with injuries in his time here? No thanks, good player but too injury prone.
I like Petry I hope he stays unless we can get younger back there like a Hanafin as a Dumo replacement. I dunno who would fill in for Petry though.At worst he's scoring depth for the 3rd line.
If Dubas can get out of the Petry and Granlund deals, we have to feel good about this offseason so far.
At worst he's scoring depth for the 3rd line.
If Dubas can get out of the Petry and Granlund deals, we have to feel good about this offseason so far.