LastWordArmy
Registered User
This guy can actually have a massive return.
Second line offence
Kills penalties
signed for 1 more year at 1.167 million.
I want a serious, serious package if we move him. That contract is absolute gold.
This guy can actually have a massive return.
If an inferior player in Dale Weise got that much, just imagine Byron, who has another year left.Agreed. He's a top-9 guy on any contender in the league and his speed (especially on the PK) is lethal. His low cap hit would also be attractive to contenders.
It would suck to see him go but it's the right thing to do.
I don't think we should trade him at all. I know that trading him sounds like the typical thing you would expect from a declining team, but that guy has been good on a consistent basis. He's also not that old and his speed does not seem to be regressing.
So do you think we can win a cup with two of Danault, Byron, Hudon, Lehkonen and Shaw in the top 6 as well as Gallagher? If not then who do we trade instead of Byron? If we trade nobody then do you think it's a good idea to waste any of those asset on a 4thy line?
Still think it would be bad management to not cash in if he's worth two 2nd or a 1st. He might be with his contract.
I don't think we should trade him at all. I know that trading him sounds like the typical thing you would expect from a declining team, but that guy has been good on a consistent basis. He's also not that old and his speed does not seem to be regressing.
No way would I trade Byron for a 2nd! Not this year anyway.Byron is very tradeable, he should get us a second round pick for sure.
Byron is very tradeable, he should get us a second round pick for sure.
byron is at least worth a first at the deadline.I wouldn't trade him for less than 2 2nd round picks.
Are you serious?byron is at least worth a first at the deadline.
yes very very serious. Look at past deadline, and let me know good defensively 20 goal scorers trade details. He has has one more year at mega bargain priceAre you serious?
yes very very serious. Look at past deadline, and let me know good defensively 20 goal scorers trade details. He has has one more year at mega bargain price
I think many underappreciated his value since he as a waiver acquisition. But previous value has nothing to do with current value
We all love Byron and would hate to lose his high skill and low cost. But that's exactly what makes him a valuable trade asset. Other teams will pay to add his current value to their team right now, while we should be grabbing as much future value as we can. Byron makes us better now; we need players who make us better in 2-5 years.I don't think we should trade him at all. I know that trading him sounds like the typical thing you would expect from a declining team, but that guy has been good on a consistent basis. He's also not that old and his speed does not seem to be regressing.
Byron is very tradeable, he should get us a second round pick for sure.
Maybe. The operative word is maybe. Who maybe makes us better in 2-5 years. The common expectation on this board is a second round pick. The percentage of a second round pick becoming a NHLer is what? Mid-twenties percent? And then factor in the percentage of him being as good as Bryon. I'm not against trading Byron but it would have to be for a prospect (between 19 & 23 years old). Otherwise I'd keep him.We all love Byron and would hate to lose his high skill and low cost. But that's exactly what makes him a valuable trade asset. Other teams will pay to add his current value to their team right now, while we should be grabbing as much future value as we can. Byron makes us better now; we need players who make us better in 2-5 years.
Are you serious?
Go back to last 2 tdl. Only PEaves got a 1st and it was actually a 2nd with conditions attached. Shattenkirk got also a 1st but it was a multiple player deal.byron is at least worth a first at the deadline.