You're talking a specific situation involving two teams that the situation doesn't apply to. Let's put it this way, there is only one team that considers Kane @ 50% for Pettersson, it isn't the Canucks. "Future first ballot hall of fame player" means nothing right now.
Value of: Patrick Kane
- Thread starter Kshahdoo
- Start date
You're talking a specific situation involving two teams that the situation doesn't apply to. Let's put it this way, there is only one team that considers Kane @ 50% for Pettersson, it isn't the Canucks. "Future first ballot hall of fame player" means nothing right now.
ColbyChaos
Marty Snoozeman's Father
Thats one way to justify your horrible trade ideas.
Seabrook for Boeser straight up
or Podkolzin, Joulevi, Boeser for DeHaan.
Podkolzin is just a prospect so who knows what he turns into.
Joulevi is a bust who has no value.
Wingers are worth less than Dmen so by your logic this trade would be a steal for Vancouver.
Last edited:
Notsince67
Papi and the Lamplighters
- Apr 27, 2018
- 16,057
- 11,250
ColbyChaos
Marty Snoozeman's Father
The only dumb take is yours. Kane has been better than Ovi and Malkin the last 5 years
BlueBaron
Registered User
Ugly thread. Too special in Chicago to get any kind of discount in a trade. Too big a hit for most teams to swallow.
I see he has 3 years left. A scenario where Chicago retains but gets a long term good value piece could make sense (a Nylander type) but balancing that out factoring in Kane's intangibles isn't something I feel qualified to try.
For the record Nylander was just a name, If I'm Chicago I probably want a serious D or future top 2 C.
I see he has 3 years left. A scenario where Chicago retains but gets a long term good value piece could make sense (a Nylander type) but balancing that out factoring in Kane's intangibles isn't something I feel qualified to try.
For the record Nylander was just a name, If I'm Chicago I probably want a serious D or future top 2 C.
Notsince67
Papi and the Lamplighters
- Apr 27, 2018
- 16,057
- 11,250
Im not even a pens fan... homer. What happen to crosby? Trying to stealthily drop that claim?
Comparing Kane’s accomplishments to that of the others they aren’t far removed at all. It’s very easy to see Kane in the same tier. Only one of them that I would say has been better is Crosby. This isn’t a new thing “Kane being regarded as in the same tier as them” i would like to see why u think Kane isn’t close to their level if u can respond in more then two sentences that would be appreciated.
Ace Card Bedard
Back in Black, Red, and White
- Feb 11, 2012
- 8,768
- 3,618
You shouldn't even utter the words Kane when comparing to Sid... thats simply idiotic. Now malkin is better, but aleast that comparison is in the realm of being slightly possible.......
I believe I mentioned Sid being better in that post. As for Malkin that very much is looking like a even slope. Malkin hasn’t hit 100 points since 2011. Kane paced at 100 points just this last year and had 110 the year before. Kane is showing no signs of slowing down. Very easy to see kane being viewed as the better player by the time they are both retired and even now
I don't have a horse in this race but malkin has also 'paced' at 100 points two of the last four years. including a 110 pt pace this past season. last 5 seasons one has two cups. malkin has 2 scoring titles to kanes one and has the higher career pts/gp. Malkin has the better career to date. would've been fun if that Malkin to Chicago trade had happened
There really is NO comparison.. malkin is a C....kane a winger ...Malkin will always have more hardware in his trophy case...he is just a tier above..notjmhijg against kane he is a great player but he is not Malkin...
Son Goku
henlo u stinky egg
Am I missing something? He’s easily a distant 4th to them. Crosby has multiple conn smythes and Malkin has the best cup run since Lemieux, not to mention their Regular season numbers completely outshine his.
If you want Pettersson you need to give up a lot.
Chi
EP
Van
Kane w/ retainment
Dach
HawksDub89
Registered User
- Apr 17, 2019
- 1,478
- 1,439
Interesting deal. If Kane ia retained it might be goos value.
Reinhart getting better every season and is good for 50p/season and maybe more.
Buff hasn't made playoffs in a long time and that 1st is likely to be good if not great.
Meanwhile Skinner had a dud of a year which he has a history of...65p one season and 30p the next.
Maybe Kane at $9m is fair value??
Yes Kane a generational player but hes 32 w/ $10.5 cap hit for 3 seasons. Still producing elite levels but at his age you worry about injuries, age recession, etc.
Buff gets Kane which gives Eichel three years of a special wingman
Chi gets a young established 2W with 1W potential, a 2/3W and a veteran with goal scoring potential, and a likely good draft pick to help the rebuild
txpd
Registered User
txpd
Registered User
No. Rocket Richard winners the last 5 years. Ovechkin, Crosby, Ovechkin, Ovechkin, Ovechkin.
Hawkaholic
Registered User
That's closer than Kane and Dach for EP.
I am Canadian
AM34|WN88|MM16
One of those conversations you never want to have but from a value standpoint it's best for Chicago and its best for Kane as well.
Send him to Washington or something at 50% retention for Eller + a boatload of prospects and picks
Send him to Washington or something at 50% retention for Eller + a boatload of prospects and picks
Wandering Cynic
Registered User
COHawk
Registered User
- Sep 16, 2015
- 2,119
- 1,020
