deadhead
Registered User
- Feb 26, 2014
- 49,215
- 21,617
15:10 is a good start.
I thought Hakstok refuses to play young players.
15:10 is a good start.
Lol...I guess scratching Weise or Lehtera is not an option in deadheads world.
I thought Hakstok refuses to play young players.
No.... Raffl can play on the 4th line. He can always take some shifts for Weal if you want to get his minutes up.Replacing them with Lindblom and playing him 8-10 minutes a night?
No, I don't think that was ever an option for Hextall.
They both play over 10 minutes a game. They play 2:30 less than Weal a game....so that's like 2 shifts a period less. Patrick only plays 2 minutes more than the new wonder twins. Plus he would be available to move up in the lineup when it warrants it.Replacing them with Lindblom and playing him 8-10 minutes a night?
No, I don't think that was ever an option for Hextall.
I thought Hakstok refuses to play young players.
They both play over 10 minutes a game. They play 2:30 less than Weal a game....so that's like 2 shifts a period less. Patrick only plays 2 minutes more than the new wonder twins. Plus he would be available to move up in the lineup when it warrants it.
Just weeks ago you were saying there is nothing wrong with guys being on the 4th line then working themselves up. You must have changed your mind.
They both play over 10 minutes a game. They play 2:30 less than Weal a game....so that's like 2 shifts a period less. Patrick only plays 2 minutes more than the new wonder twins. Plus he would be available to move up in the lineup when it warrants it.
Just weeks ago you were saying there is nothing wrong with guys being on the 4th line then working themselves up. You must have changed your mind.
Giroux-Coots-Konecny
Lindblom-Patrick-Jake
Weal-Laughton-Simmonds
Lehtera-Flip-Wiese
"One of these things is not like the others,
One of these things just doesn't belong"
The sorest of all thumbs.
I would love for all 3 not to be there but it is what it is for the rest of this year.
Not at all as I thought the same thing.Ok back to our newfound top9 talent. Is it weird if watching him I'm reminded of couturier?
He was very very solid defensively as well. Great on back checks and picking up assignments away from the puck. I can't see how they could justify sending him back as he is clearly 100% ready to contribute
I could see him become one of Hakstol's favourites very soon. He reads plays very well both sides of the rink, uses his stick well, throws a little bump to distract a potential shooter in the slot before the puck even arrives, alot of subtle but important work.
I could see him become one of Hakstol's favourites very soon. He reads plays very well both sides of the rink, uses his stick well, throws a little bump to distract a potential shooter in the slot before the puck even arrives, alot of subtle but important work.