Price is Wright
Registered User
He's great. Always liked him. Think there's more to his game to develop. Don't think Toronto really handled him as well as they could have. Solid contract though.
With the addition of Tavares, the leafs appear to be fairly stacked on their center depth and as most of you already have read trade proposals from random leaf fans looking for defensive help, you read about trouba, paryako and other top defenseman.... A nice endless cycle, but realistically what would a player like Kadri fetch ?
If you ask me I think toronto needs to be calling up the canes being they have pretty good depth on defense and could use some center help so kadri to carolina as an outside fan looks like a good fit.
Help the leaf fans with an actual fair value assessment with their players and let's find them a defenseman that would be available for someone like kadri.
Nazem Kadri hockey statistics and profile at hockeydb.com
I agree I believe Kadri for Faulk is a solid deal
I like Kadri but this is an immense stretch. Not just on their skill level but also how they played the game.Reminds me of Messier
Correct. He’s a 3C
Shuts down McDavid, but he's overrated?Kadri is an excellent C who plays a physical, (at times dirty), game while putting up decent numbers. He was used in a defensive role by the Leafs, and I don't think he is particularly good at it. His defensive proficiency is vastly overrated by some. He certainly needs to work on his discipline. Having said that, he possesses great offensive skills and would be a great physical but offense-minded 2C on most teams.
Kadri is a valuable asset. Not sure the Leafs will trade him but you never know. He'd definitely generate a lot of interest around the league and would bring in a good D-Man in return. Who that is.......dunno.
And the Leafs would still look good down the middle, if they were to trade him. After Matthews and Tavares, they'd still have Nylander(if needed), and then Gauthier, Lindholm, Altonen and maybe Brooks.
Not as good as with Kadri in there, but still good compared to many teams out there.
I look at Kadri as insurance if one of JT or Auston is on the shelf for a while. As it sits, if all three are running at their best, they will be difficult to compete against. Defense be damned!Kadri is a valuable asset. Not sure the Leafs will trade him but you never know. He'd definitely generate a lot of interest around the league and would bring in a good D-Man in return. Who that is.......dunno.
And the Leafs would still look good down the middle, if they were to trade him. After Matthews and Tavares, they'd still have Nylander(if needed), and then Gauthier, Lindholm, Altonen and maybe Brooks.
Not as good as with Kadri in there, but still good compared to many teams out there.
I don't really disagree with too much of this and I actually agree that Tavares will see much more of the high end matchups. Do you expect one of Kadri, Tavares or Matthews to play wing at ES? Because otherwise it will be tough to have those three eat up 46.5 ES minutes unless you really only play 3 lines. That number would leave only a two or three minutes of ES time for the fourth line.
Kadri asked Dubas if he could be part of the recruitment process to get Tavares. Doesn't make sense that he'd do that if he wasn't comfortable with the idea of having him on the team.With JT and Matthews as 1 & 2 will Kadri be upset about his possible ice time and not want to play a 3C shutdown role? Maybe ask for a trade to a team where he can be a true #1 center?
Average #2. Elite #3
How many seasons compared to how many times reaching that mark? You cant say 2 seasons as every season...How many average 2Cs in the league put up 30 goals a season while playing a shutdown checking role?
How many seasons compared to how many times reaching that mark? You cant say 2 seasons as every season...
What numbers are dropping from what they were 3 years ago?
It's been questioned whether the Leafs need a #4C at all this season. I think we can use one but he'd be more or less a place holder who would eat up some garbage time and other than that not play much at all and probably average less then 5 minutes a game.
That's probably a recipe for a disaster. Your top three can probably handle those minutes individually but it impacts not just them but the whole team. Unless the plan is to do a fair bit of double shifting this means that you run effectively three lines and over an NHL season you will increase both burnouts and injuries. Teams these days have for the most part moved away from the three line plus plugs model. They use the 4th line as a high energy line that can also help keep the top 9 fresh. I don't have statistical evidence to back this up by I suspect that 4th lines are actually playing more minutes these days not less.
Leivo doesn't fit in Montreal. He can skate and he can score“Another stud” like your last third overall pick galchenyuk... er domi? Or that one kid you guys took 6 picks too early kotka-notzadina?
We could trade you Leivo, you could try him out as a number 1 center!
Everyone need one. If he could elevate his hitting to Darcy Tucker level, I would advocate he has his number retired when he finally hangs them upGreat player, but a total ****, like Marchand.