- Apr 2, 2008
- 26,009
- 13,841
This would be terrible value
I agree, but it's what I'm expecting.
This would be terrible value
I agree, but it's what I'm expecting.
I think you're misattributing the reasoning behind why Batherson was kept down, and the coach and GM have both said that it was precisely because they didn't want him up until he was overdone, and have echoed that sentiment about many other players, including Formenton, Sokolov, and JBD.
It's clearly an organizational philosophy, they have straight up said that specific players won't start in the NHL regardless of whether they are top 12 F/top 6 D on our team. Add in the fact that he's a DMan and that they have 7 guys on one-way deals and it only compounds that fact.
And they are absolutely NOT saying what you're saying they are. To act like it is a simple decision based on who is best is bordering on deliberate obtuseness. In fact, they have openly expressed an organizational philosophy to the contrary. Sens aren't trading Brannstrom if they don't get value, because why on earth would they? He will either be dealt for value or he will grow into a role slowly with us. I suspect this will all be made moot very soon, although I do still think Brann will be traded.
Why exactly is there a report by Friedman saying Brannstrom could be traded then? There wasn't this report on any other core Ottawa player that was kept in the AHL, if Ottawa simply wanted Brannstrom to be overdone in the AHL there wouldn't be this rumor in the first place. Ottawa has one year left to figure out what they want to do with him, because if they end up waiting until next year and he doesn't make the team with DJ at the helm, it'll just be another L. Brown situation where his value plummets.
Jeremy Colliton would never give minutes to Brannstrom. He hates Ian Mitchell. Not to mention Stanley traded away Boqvist.Dylan Strome ?
He could be traded because he plays in our strongest position and he's wasted in a 3rd pairing role. Which Sens fans have been aware of for a long time. Add in the fact that 2 of our top 5 C's are injured long-term and it becomes an obvious bit of speculation.
The day that Sanderson was drafted, this was discussed by Sens fans as a near-eventuality. Doesn't mean they don't like him, won't play him, or anything of the sorts. DJ Smith literally called him an everyday NHL D 15 times this preseason.
Stupidity.So if the point is to field out potential offers since he's not in their long-term plans since he'd be wasted on the 3rd pairing, DJ saying he's a NHL defenseman, and he'd be an upgrade over the roster... why exactly is he in the AHL?
Because he has a two way contract and doesn’t require waiver whereas the other 7 do, and DJ isn’t going to play him every night over the other 7 from day 1 of the season. We’re 3 games in with two new vets on the roster. It’s sort of…. much ado about nothing.So if the point is to field out potential offers since he's not in their long-term plans since he'd be wasted on the 3rd pairing, DJ saying he's a NHL defenseman, and he'd be an upgrade over the roster... why exactly is he in the AHL?
Because he has a two way contract and doesn’t require waiver whereas the other 7 do, and DJ isn’t going to play him every night over the other 7 from day 1 of the season. We’re 3 games in with two new vets on the roster. It’s sort of…. much ado about nothing.
OkHolden and Del Zotto have each been waived in their careers. A young rebuilding team playing worse dmen like them instead of a young player because they don't want to lose a Holden or Del Zotto is shortsighted.
Either Brannstrom isn't good enough to beat them out or OTT's management doesn't know how to properly rebuild.
What does that make Toronto with their extra spending if they can't even get as far as Ottawa with their limited budget?Ottawa is a feeder team for the rest of the league. They traded Stone for spare parts.