Doubt he gets a contract, we dont need 14 left shooting D on 1 way contracts.
Many of you have seen theories I have posted on HF boards for last 7 years.
Plus Lowetide for the last 12 years. Copied, borrowed, sto.... by the analytic hockey community.
Since I got Cancer I am on long term disability from my job as 11 eng field triarchal (design, run, maintain) as-build and Data collector/verifier for AB Coal Power Plant survival/conversion anslysis & modelling.
I have been going back and recapturing my posts on the blogs I presented portions of my theories. What I thought was 20+ base theories can be broken down into 70+ academic structured theory papers.
Most hockey analytics people are linear game theorist who limit outside mechanisms that influence play so they get a binary outcome with regression. The leading binary theorists who rejected my type multi variable approach. Are getting into human interaction and a abandoning it to go to my aproach to anslysis. Cause it can be easily partnered with old school scouting and video review. Which I do.
I have used a real world multi variable Boolean goal diff system and player mechanism approach to hockey anslysis. So I generate a map of outcomes from single system orbplayer mechsnisms that can have many results that direct you anywhere on the Goal diff success map I generated.
It lets you identify the best system and player mechanism that lead to +ve goal diff.
It lets you Identify the high goal diff actions.
HD shots ( homeplate) go in 5 times more than LD (perimeter) shots.
Elite 0% corsi dmen (#1 Russell) allow the lowest % of shots requiring movement to stop an open (open space in net elevation) shot.
Fwd NZ trap his the highest reducer of Zone entryie. corsi against.
Top 5 reg ssn GA teams can win a cup with bott 30 GF
Top 5 reg ssn GF teams can only win cups with top 15 ga.
Non top 16 GA teams can advance to round of 16 ( playoffs ) and round of 8 20-40% more than non top 16 GF teams.
Elite GA is the critical driver for championship performance.
Off dmen are not dmen but rovers based on structure position and zone minutes.
CHL scouts I have talked to now believe they are rovers.
Rovers create a 3F -1R - 1D - 1G structure rather than the traditional 3 - 2-1.
A 1R-1D-1G structure yeild High HD shot rates and often leaves the dman in outnumbered play in front of our net. ( we’re is Waldo (the rover))
Rovers when compared to forwards are 4 times less successful at generating even goals than forwards. Get the puck to the 210-300 fwds ASAP.
The top 5 rovers performe at a #6 to #9 fwd level (3rd line) and the rest perform at #10 fwd (4th line) or less.
Rovers like Nurse and Klefbom have limited cup core value and create a large negative GA affect.
Garrison Is a type of player needed in the cup core. He has been a top 60 HD dman for 7 of last 8 years. He maybe the needed depth to further cover for Sekeras loss.
Oiler D:
Larsson RD Top 5 1st comp HD with the ability to cover (homeplate) in a 1R-1D-G structure. One of 3 1st comp in NHL. That is more cup core elite than every forward but Mcdavid, Crosby.
Sekera LD Top 10 HD 2nd comp or lower.
Gravel RD top 15 HD 2nd comp when not crohns affected.
Benning RD top 60 HD 2nd/3rd comp
Garrison PTO LD Top,20-60 HD tepemdeng on comp????
Russell #1 0% corsi Dman, Top 20 hd results with top 10 1sr & 2nd comp HD d.
2 potential top 60 HD dmen still available
Top 45Sbisa injured last year.
Emelin with top 30 results last year. Has Top 20 results with elite 1st comp hD dmen. Could provide 1 st comp depth protection.