ThreeOfAPerfectPair
Registered User
Chia needs to get drunk with a few other GM's and get some handshake deals forced in.
Chia need to get the other GM's drunk while dealing sober and he might have a chance at a fair trade.Chia needs to get drunk with a few other GM's and get some handshake deals forced in.
You just described the Hall for Larsson deal.Chia needs to get drunk with a few other GM's and get some handshake deals forced in.
That's either not crazy at all or just crazy enough to make sense.Crazy trade idea..
Carolina moves Lindholm or Hanifin to the Flames in a deal involving Hamilton
Carolina then flips Hamilton to us in a deal involving Puljujarvi/10th overall.
I have so little respect for Chia that I'll consider it a win if he comes out of trades with dirt on his face instead of layers of caked-on mud.Lucic for Gallagher. Come on Chia. Come out victorious for once
Yeah. It was brought up when Weber was still with Nashville and there was a lot of media and fan speculation the Oilers wanted to trade for him. I said 2013 in my other post but I think it was 2014 and then again in 2015, because Draisaitl was talked about as part of a possible return.wait, seriously ?
We need secondary scoring and depth more than a right handed dman. McDavid will still need to do it all on his own
Let's be honest guys we need a lot.Considering last season we couldn't even make a single breakout pass... does it matter? We'd gain control in our zone and rim it around the boards or made a terrible half-assed passed into the NZ that led to a turnover. Only Nurse could skate it out of the zone...
Crazy trade idea..
Carolina moves Lindholm or Hanifin to the Flames in a deal involving Hamilton
Carolina then flips Hamilton to us in a deal involving Puljujarvi/10th overall.
We would need to add something like a 2nd in 19Lucic for Gallagher. Come on Chia. Come out victorious for once
We would need to add something like a 2nd in 19
Don't you mean fortunately? There's nothing remotely interesting on that roster (Pacioretty is not worth the overpay)
Arguing Chicago had no dead cap is a losing argument. You're talking about a team that gave away Teuvo Teravainen to clear Bryan Bickell's salary and left TVR exposed to Vegas to clear Marcus Kruger's salary. They've got Marian Hossa's salary still on payroll for the next few years as well. They're the dead cap capital of the NHL, they just pay quality assets to get some other team to foot the bill.Chicago and Washington had none and Pittsburgh had some real bargain contracts from players outperoming them as well . The point being there was no reasoning to add cap space for 2 years on a veteran 7th dman that has no hit on any teams cap if sent down . take that into account and the 700 k that Cagg and Benning were overpaid we could bring back Maroon at 3.5 per year , just no foresight in chia no bargains just in the now type gm .
Larsson, Klefbom, Nurse, SekeraI understand that secondary scoring is important but ummm who would get the puck to our forwards?
A sound transition game would do wonders, adding an offensive dman and helps way more than secondary scoring
Arguing Chicago had no dead cap is a losing argument. You're talking about a team that gave away Teuvo Teravainen to clear Bryan Bickell's salary and left TVR exposed to Vegas to clear Marcus Kruger's salary. They've got Marian Hossa's salary still on payroll for the next few years as well. They're the dead cap capital of the NHL, they just pay quality assets to get some other team to foot the bill.
Agreed the Gryba buyout is a curious one right now, but bring up the Pouliot one seems a bit against the point you seem to be trying to make considering his salary next season would've negated whatever cap space we would've had available.
Chiarelli needs to stop selling low.
He did it with Hall (arguable)...then Eberle...and will likely do the same with Lucic.
Chia will overpay for his guy. Money, trade assets, term, NMC, whatever. If we don't have them, it means that he valued them less.
*Who* he overpaid is as important *how much* he overpays. If he chose the right guy to overpay (Hamilton, Subban, Jones, maybe even Dumba or Barrie) he wouldn't have to trade for a dman over and over again. Overpay once and be done with it. Instead, we're still searching.
Yeah, I don't disagree with that. I think the infuriating player part may have had a little more of an influence into that decision than we were privy to. I think if there was any market for him at half his salary here, he would've been traded in an instant.I haven't followed the full argument, but re: Pouliot the main argument used is: why didn't we buy him out this season? We had the space last season. Same idea as Eberle - our cap restriction hits this summer, not last. Delaying a buyout a year later makes the penalty shorter. Plus I still think they could have just retained and traded him for next to nothing, as Pouliot was still an NHL level player, if an infuriating one.
Not going to get into the merits of it yet again but just thought I'd pipe up with that bit.
I haven't followed the full argument, but re: Pouliot the main argument used is: why didn't we buy him out this season? We had the space last season. Same idea as Eberle - our cap restriction hits this summer, not last. Delaying a buyout a year later makes the penalty shorter. Plus I still think they could have just retained and traded him for next to nothing, as Pouliot was still an NHL level player, if an infuriating one.
Not going to get into the merits of it yet again but just thought I'd pipe up with that bit.
Fired Woodcroft... Oh wait, they promoted him. Never mind
But we now have an extra contract space to sign Dylan Larkin’s 3rd cousin. Doesn’t matter that he’s a water boy, he has great genes.Erik Gryba, the gift that keeps on giving...
Never should have traded for the player. Never should have signed him to a PTO and a subsequent 1 year deal the following season. DEFINITELY never should have signed him to a 2 year deal last summer after he'd lost his spot.
And now one season later we inexplicably buy him out instead of just burying him in the minors this upcoming season for no cap penalty? So not only do we have a 300k penalty against us that we can't really afford to have this season, the penalty carries over to next season?
It is astounding how this organization can seemingly misstep at every single possible opportunity.
In response to the inane defense of "we need that spot for the 50 roster limit" maybe this organization shouldn't have signed no future scrubs like Colin Larkin?
wait, seriously ?