ToneDog
56 years and counting. #FireTheShanaClan!
If he gets traded he will tear it up on the other team. Thats not a fact , thats a rule of life.
Good for Willie and who ever trades for him. Trades are meant to help both parties.
If he gets traded he will tear it up on the other team. Thats not a fact , thats a rule of life.
my only question is why?Zero chance. Leafs will match any OS that comes but I doubt any come. Willie will be tradeable even if he sh1ts the bed for the rest of the year. The Canes love this guy and think he is part of the solution to their scoring problems.
I could care less, he's not working here, get something for him, bank the savings, and move on.If he gets traded he will tear it up on the other team. Thats not a fact , thats a rule of life.
Could be. But chances are here splitting between 1st and 3rd line, always behind Matthews/Marner/Tavares and last night even Kapanen, 2nd fiddle PP, he won’t here.If he gets traded he will tear it up on the other team. Thats not a fact , thats a rule of life.
I could care less, he's not working here, get something for him, bank the savings, and move on.
I can't picture the Flyers wanting him, and could you imagine how his non contact game would be received by the Philly fans?Yep. As I have been saying the biggest return we can get for Willie is the cap savings. It'll allow us to keep a very good player, or players, that would otherwise have to walk.
Trade him to Philly for Simmonds and futures. Use the cap savings to resign our own guys that would have otherwise walked ie some combination of Gardiner, Kappy, AJ. Get a first round pick back to boot.
Good for Willie and who ever trades for him. Trades are meant to help both parties.
my only question is why?
I truely hope your right.Same reason Bergevin traded for Drouin. They are desperate and they believe a change of scenery can turn the player around.
His overall impact is right in line with guys that gets that cap hit%. If he was getting a bigger role than that, he'd be worth more.The trouble Nith when you pay a player 7 million dollars, I expect him to be used in all Johnny Hockey,Tarasenko,Pastrnak,etc. Situations.
Up and down between 1st line-3rd line, 2nd PP unit, not one of the guys in the last minute is not a 7 million cap hit. When JT was signed you basically kicked him down the depth chart. To the extent that he may never achieve the totals he would as a 1st/2nd line center. Whereas a top 4 D would instantly kick up the lineup moving the others down (rightfully so as depth).
But I heard we were 3rd in puck possession since WN returned and we have been dominant. Your numbers make no sense. What is your agenda ?
Based on what leaf fans keep telling me, zone entries are the most important part of hockey. He may not score. The team may always lose when he plays. But he has good ZONE ENTRIES. Teams will give up MAJOR assets for him.His perceived worth is going down right now by the day. How could it not be? Performance is the measurement of pay.
I've noticed a significant drop in the "Stat Nerd's" replies lately. I think even they are realizing the eye test is making spewing cherry picked stats a embarrassing proposition.Based on what leaf fans keep telling me, zone entries are the most important part of hockey. He may not score. The team may always lose when he plays. But he has good ZONE ENTRIES. Teams will give up MAJOR assets for him.
I don't think you understand what cherry picked means.I've noticed a significant drop in the "Stat Nerd's" replies lately. I think even they are realizing the eye test is making spewing cherry picked stats a embarrassing proposition.
I don't think you understand what cherry picked means.
People are probably just tired of trying to argue with toxic posters who don't listen anyway, and who seem way too pleased to see a player on their team struggling.
Absolutely. You can't be expected to be a top producer and not be garbage if you get 3 points in 16 games.Theres no argument. Nylander has been garbage. Anyone that says otherwise, while using zone entry and possession stats, is just kidding themselves.
oh dear, I think your going to be labelled "toxic"............Theres no argument. Nylander has been garbage. Anyone that says otherwise, while using zone entry and possession stats, is just kidding themselves.
highly unlikely, but to make it affordable it'd have to be a expanded trade, adding Talbot coming our way, Sparks going their way and other pieces involved. Almost impossible to get and give a package that both teams would be happy with imo.Given his struggles and mutual team needs could a Nylander to EDM trade work out? The cap would be hard to make work but could Nurse + Pulju + picks/prospects benefit both teams?
I don't think you understand what cherry picked means.
People are probably just tired of trying to argue with toxic posters who don't listen anyway, and who seem way too pleased to see a player on their team struggling.
Quite ironic to see that post after I had already written @HouseofBuggins a respectful response. You see, he knows that you can discuss and criticize without being toxic about it or gloating about the misfortunes of our own players.oh dear, I think your going to be labelled "toxic"............
One of those things I've always heard, but almost never seen in practice. As I see it, it often becomes one poster with an opinion backed up by tangible evidence, and another poster who backs it up with anecdotal evidence.It's also impossible to argue with advanced stats "nerds" because they think that their advanced stats are gospel. Willy is fair game to criticize. He wanted a big payday, he sat out 2 months, now he got it and not performing. He needs to up his game a couple of notches, at least.
That guy is the king of name calling. He suggested I was racist before.oh dear, I think your going to be labelled "toxic"............
oh dear, I think your going to be labelled "toxic"............
That guy is the king of name calling. He suggested I was racist before.