Whileee
Registered User
- May 29, 2010
- 46,075
- 33,132
Regardless of their stylistic differences, the results that Ehlers achieves have been better than Connor if you consider actual offensive production (goals and points per 60 minutes) or shot metrics (Corsi, expected goals).Ehlers major issue is that he doesn't know what to do with the puck when he has it - he'll gain the zone but nothing much happens once they are in the zone.
He doesn't have good instincts with line mates - he likes to hang on too long - in other words, he's not much of a playmaker.
His skating is top shelf, his edges are even better - that's his strength. His shooting is good but he doesn't score many goals around the net or by beating defenders in tight. Give him room and he's killer - crowd him and he tends to skate into a corner.
Skill wise, I see Connor as the likely the most "talented" player on the team - with room to fine tune the D side of this game which is a shortfall. He also needs to be more effective off the rush - but he has the skills to learn that part of the game.
Regardless, I'd be very surprised if the org were to move Connor - even if they had to move one of their top 4 wingers
I wish they would move Ehlers onto the 1st line and Connor to the 2nd so the narrative would hopefully stop on how much better Ehlers would be on the 1st line.
Whenever Ehlers has been on the top line they have performed much better than with Connor in terms of shot metrics, goal differentials and penalty differentials.
I'll go with the player that generates better results.