Habfan10
Registered User
- May 16, 2015
- 498
- 131
If Mtl releases him back to OHL than he can be eligible to go to the Olympics.I'm not sure but I think since they have a NHL contract, they are ineligible to perform.
If Mtl releases him back to OHL than he can be eligible to go to the Olympics.I'm not sure but I think since they have a NHL contract, they are ineligible to perform.
A difference maker for what? Helping us get the 15th overall pick instead of the 7th?
There's nothing good to come from bringing him up to try to salvage a season that's already lost.
He has 90 games less in the AHL than Hudon had.
Sounded like he would be eligible if released to the OHL since he would no longer be eligible to play in the NHL this season.Think it's the NHL rules.
Radulov would have been a consistent 60+ point guy had he not been playing in Russia though. using him as an example is highly disingenuous.
As for Scherbak, he's literally 9 days away from being 22 and hasn't shown he can stick in the NHL yet. I realize he's had health issues and still has a bright future, but if he was a gamebreaker, he'd already be in the NHL. Gamebreaking ability is almost always shown early. I can't think of a single player who couldn't even stick around in the NHL by their 22 year old season who went on to become an elite player. Pacioretty is probably the closest example I can think of, who I don't think many of us would call "elite" and even he had more NHL success through his year 22 season.
Perfect, a good example. Somewhat unique in that he did 4 years of University and dominated the IHL/AHL every year he played there, but even in spite of this didn't nail down an NHL spot until his age 25 season.Martin St-louis
Perfect, a good example. Somewhat unique in that he did 4 years of University and dominated the IHL/AHL every year he played there, but even in spite of this didn't nail down an NHL spot until his age 25 season.
You of course had to go back nearly 20 years to find an example though. Another example could be Brett Hull if you want to go further back, although he like St. Louis did 4 years of college, which really skews things.
Scherbak's really got the deck stacked against him. Its basically unheard of for any player who didn't go through the US college system for 4 years to go on to become an elite player when they hadn't nailed down an NHL job by their age 22 season. Even if you include players who went through the US college system it is extremely rare.
Radulov would have been a consistent 60+ point guy had he not been playing in Russia though. using him as an example is highly disingenuous.
As for Scherbak, he's literally 9 days away from being 22 and hasn't shown he can stick in the NHL yet. I realize he's had health issues and still has a bright future, but if he was a gamebreaker, he'd already be in the NHL. Gamebreaking ability is almost always shown early. I can't think of a single player who couldn't even stick around in the NHL by their 22 year old season who went on to become an elite player. Pacioretty is probably the closest example I can think of, who I don't think many of us would call "elite" and even he had more NHL success through his year 22 season.
I totally allow for that, and I'm not trying to write him off, I still believe he has a future on this team. I just don't think that future is on the top line though. That's all I'm trying to say. Not that he's a bust, but that if he was going to be a game breaking type player for us he'd almost certainly have forced his way on to the team by now.You're saying it as if Scherbak was given a real opportunity.
He played 3 nhl games last year and then got sent back down.
This year, he's been dominating the ahl, and got called up. He played 2 games and then got injured. He played on the 4th line and looked pretty good. Had he not gotten injured, he mightve still been on our roster today.
I totally allow for that, and I'm not trying to write him off, I still believe he has a future on this team. I just don't think that future is on the top line though. That's all I'm trying to say. Not that he's a bust, but that if he was going to be a game breaking type player for us he'd almost certainly forced his way on to the team by now.
Briere took a while to get going, but he had played 82 games in the NHL through his age 22 season. He didn't have much success, but showed he could at least make some sort of impact.Daniel Briere
I hope I'm wrong, I like the kid and if he can become a top line player like Pacioretty then that would be awesome. That could only mean good things for us, but I'm only trying to be realistic. If he manages to do that he'd be in very rare company in terms of going from non-NHLer at 22 to top line player. I see him as a 3rd liner with a decent scoring touch. 2nd line winger I would think is he absolute best case scenario though, and there's nothing wrong with that, especially considering his draft position.Hard to say that in his case because of how his AHL seasons have gone. Multiple injuries, playing for Lefebvre, getting moved to a new position whenever scoring consistently, or getting a call up whenever scoring consistently.
He's been unlucky and hasn't been handled very well up to this point. He has the talent to be a game breaker, and very well could be a top line player, or a top 6 player, if he's handled better, improves more and gets stronger. Avoiding injury is a big part of this and also getting proper handling and development, that may not happen considering our track record in the Bergevin era.
I totally allow for that, and I'm not trying to write him off, I still believe he has a future on this team. I just don't think that future is on the top line though. That's all I'm trying to say. Not that he's a bust, but that if he was going to be a game breaking type player for us he'd almost certainly have forced his way on to the team by now.
I hope I'm wrong, I like the kid and if he can become a top line player like Pacioretty then that would be awesome. That could only mean good things for us, but I'm only trying to be realistic. If he manages to do that he'd be in very rare company in terms of going from non-NHLer at 22 to top line player. I see him as a 3rd liner with a decent scoring touch. 2nd line winger I would think is he absolute best case scenario though, and there's nothing wrong with that, especially considering his draft position.
When Scherbak was drafted he was advertised as a raw talent. And from the first training camp, we could see he came as advertised: very talented, and very raw. Now, we're seeing that raw talent starting to bloom and to crystalize. It's an exciting time and it will be interesting to see how high his ceiling is.
Bottom line: with a prospect like Scherbak, patience is key. But we'll be able to see what he really is over the next three years. I'm looking forward to them. He's got a lot of talent. The most important thing, imo, is for him to play a lot of minutes, whether in the AHL or the NHL.
If a first round pick isn’t producing in the NHL 5 years after drafted , they More than likely never will. I’d love to see a list of first round picks that became productive NHL players five year after drafted
That will be a short list. If by next year Sherbak isnt in Montreal producing , he never will
I certainly see him being called up at some point again. Maybe not right after the freeze but soon enough. I just wonder if calling him up to potentially play on a bottom line is worth it though.
If a first round pick isn’t producing in the NHL 5 years after drafted , they More than likely never will. I’d love to see a list of first round picks that became productive NHL players five year after drafted
That will be a short list. If by next year Sherbak isnt in Montreal producing , he never will
He's not even 21 yet, producing offensively in the AHL for a full year will help him and hopefully he can come to camp stronger next season and ready for a job in the NHL.
Oops, that's what I meant to say haha. Even though it feels like he's been around for a while, I often forget he's still that young given his late birthday.He turns 22 next week.