Can't complain about this signing. He's played well and is the only physical threat on the team.
yeah, seems to me these are the types of deal you get out of the way first.True the Habs have bigger fish to fry. But they need to sign 4th liners either way. Might as well sign the guy that's here right now.
If D'Lo is ready for an extension, you tell him to wait until the Top-6 is fixed first? He's good at what he does and it was probably an easy negotiation.
Though I don’t think he is going anywhere signing a 4th liner extension certainly is not indicative of that.It just means that Marc Bergevin is the GM of this team until further notice.
I would have gone longer term, but am satisfied with this. I would like to see Carr and Deslaurier on the wings of the 4th line all year.
What numbers could they put up over a full season?
what gave you the impression that signing Deslauriers was a priority?
I would of given him a 3 or 4 year deal too but he likely would be asking for more AAV. We were able to get Byron for 3 years at $1.17M when he was age 27. Deslaurier is also age 27 next year. I think he's a solid piece and I like his game. He keeps it simple and finishes his checks. He provides some scoring on the 4th line and is smack in the middle of his prime where he has matured into who is is today. I would of given him a $1.2M deal for 3 or years if he would of taken it.
I expect him to continue to finish his checks and be one of the leaders in the league in hits. While he is able to score 5-10 goals and maybe 20 pts
watch him start to ****ing suck now
I sincerely believe this organization has bigger issues and priorities at play than the recent signing of Nicholas Deslauriers yes.You sincerely don't feel that this organization has historically prioritized acquiring/locking up role players?
Not saying this is what happened here necessarily, but would it really surprise you? It's been MB's MO his entire tenure.
Yeah i wouldn't have give 3 or 4 years for a guy who had a good month in his entire career.
He got 1 points in his last 12 games....he's a good 4th liner mainly cause he's really physical, but let's blow things out of proportion here. He was the flavor of the month but if we look aat his body of work his entire career, even 2 years is pushing it.
You missed showing that it was $1.2M and not a $2M+ type contract. If it don't work out, you end up having a solid asset for the AHL where his salary can be burred. Byron had 18 pts in 62 games and he got a 3 year deal. It's a similar type move. I would of had no problem giving him a 3 or 4 year deal at something just over $1M. He's age 27 next year and a 4 year deal takes him to 30.
If you give 3-4 years for a plug....you'll end up giving 8 years to guys like Lehkonen
Galchenyuk got 3 years.....
Price long termYou sincerely don't feel that this organization has historically prioritized acquiring/locking up role players?
Not saying this is what happened here necessarily, but would it really surprise you? It's been MB's MO his entire tenure.
Which top 6 forward do we have right now deserves a long term contract??Dime a dozen guy, if i'm being generous, and he has done nothing to warrant a 2 year contract. We have no top 6, who cares about the bottom six? we're as bad as the oilers.
Dime a dozen guy, if i'm being generous, and he has done nothing to warrant a 2 year contract. We have no top 6, who cares about the bottom six? we're as bad as the oilers.