FlyTimmo
pit <3
- Jul 10, 2013
- 12,437
- 10,481
Giroux, Tavaress? Ok, I give up.
I'd easily, easily take them over Datsyuk.
Giroux, Tavaress? Ok, I give up.
I'd easily, easily take them over Datsyuk, it is almost not even close for me.
These ratings are terrible. Kane only a 88?
Seems pretty fair to me. Kane's defense is a joke, he gives little to no effort. Overall rating represents all aspects of hockey not just offense.
And Crosby having the same def.awerness as Datsyuk is ok?
What do you mean by saying "take them"? If you mean take them, to my team now, considering their age, so of course everyone who is in a right mind, would take younger ones, even if their overall are slightly worse.
But if we are talking who is better player now. I really can't see how Giroux or Tavaress are better then Datsyuk.
Datsyuk is the best all around player in the world. You people are morons.
No Vanek? its gonna be fun playing as the sabres this year...
Holy ****, Price 90?
Burns is exactly where he should be. This is a beard-adjusted overall. His beard-growing abilities are brobably the best in the league.
lol @ Dan Girardi being an 88 and being ahead of McDonagh. EA hasn't watched a Rangers game in over a calender year.
My biggest problem with this is they put a. Pietrangelo ahead of all defenseman.
Id give a 95 for Crosby, a 93 for Malkin, Ovi, and Stamkos. Then a 92 for Toews, Weber, Chara, Karlsson, and Lundqvist. A 91 for Datsyuk, Tavares, Giroux, Sutor, and Quick. And a 90 for St. Louis, Kane, Hall Keith, Doughty, and Rinne.