NE's & Getz's GM Game #5 - Sign Up + Discussion (Game Closed)

[virothepyro]

Don't forget to give him staal, and then sign Jagr and then put him in that deal. I still thunk Pittsburgh gets the better end of the deal here

Would work if Pittsburgh also sent a DVD copy of the big lebowski

 

[GarfSnowed]

Would work if Pittsburgh also sent a DVD copy of the big lebowski

And the dude must make a live appearance amd perform with simple Jack and George parros mustache on broadway
It is stated in the contract

 

[BoldNewLettuce]

 

[virothepyro]

I think we may have it all worked out

 

[JumpierPegasus]

Fine Crosby malkin fleury and letang for the stache
If thats not enough, then a firt round pick

dude that's garbage...

I will give you the Toronto Maple Leafs + Crosby + picks through 2134 for that Stache

 

[sakupi]

Yeah Totally stupid game...let's put 100$ each, then the game will be more serious....pathetic

 

[virothepyro]

I really think we all need to make some white Russians to fully comprehend the importance of this deal.

 

[The Instigator]

Jägerbombs!

 

[donghabs98]

This game is out of control
The comish needs to veto some deals

 

[virothepyro]

This game is out of control
The comish needs to veto some deals

Our deal is the only one I had not vetoed, mostly because I misread the first page

 

[OrangeZebra]

I have an idea. When two GM's want to make a trade, all of the other GM's vote on whether to pass it or not

 

[donghabs98]

Our deal is the only one I had not vetoed, mostly because I misread the first page

Ya I miss read it too

 

[virothepyro]

Ya I miss read it too

At least I wasn't alone in doing that

 

[The Instigator]

I have an idea. When two GM's want to make a trade, all of the other GM's vote on whether to pass it or not

No. The time it would take. Ugh.

 

[Regina Pat]

I have an idea. When two GM's want to make a trade, all of the other GM's vote on whether to pass it or not

K, you do that, and see how long this game takes.

 

[BoldNewLettuce]

unless you get guys on multiple accounts, I don't see the point of vetoing anything....but thats just me...
gm's make bad decisions...

see; Mike Milbury's career....

 

[OrangeZebra]

Instead of having every GM do it, we would only need to have 45% of the GM's vote

 

[The Instigator]

How about I just volunteer to be the 3rd guy to get trades sent to him, and I'll veto deals that are lopsided and stupid. That way everybody hates me and not the commishes. Is everyone in agreement that my judgement on trades is justifiable?

 

[JumpierPegasus]

How about I just volunteer to be the 3rd guy to get trades sent to him, and I'll veto deals that are lopsided and stupid. That way everybody hates me and not the commishes. Is everyone in agreement that my judgement on trades is justifiable?

Oh you're serious

 

[scrappylilnobody]

How about I just volunteer to be the 3rd guy to get trades sent to him, and I'll veto deals that are lopsided and stupid. That way everybody hates me and not the commishes. Is everyone in agreement that my judgement on trades is justifiable?

The problem is that every lopsided deal shouldn't be vetoed. There should be a few that go through even if the value isn't there... You have pretty decent judgement though. I just don't want a few terrible trades to make it so no trade that isn't completely even goes through.

 

[The Instigator]

I just mean ones where a teams future is obliterated for sub-par pieces.

 

[virothepyro]

Well I am out for the night, not sure what's going to happen but if we end up restarting the game maybe we add this to the rules. Any trade sent in must have a reason for the deal being made included. So like if I trade Anderson I would need to put a reason my number 1 goalie is being traded.

 

[The Instigator]

Well I am out for the night, not sure what's going to happen but if we end up restarting the game maybe we add this to the rules. Any trade sent in must have a reason for the deal being made included. So like if I trade Anderson I would need to put a reason my number 1 goalie is being traded.

That's an amazing idea.

 

[MM425]

I'm all for activity and blockbuster deals even but why can't we all just have an agreement to use some freaking common sense and at least somewhat ground whatever deals we make in reality.

I also like the idea of attaching an explanation for trades. If you can't articulate a somewhat plausible reason for your trade, than it gets vetoed.

I'd love to hear one for that Tyler Myers deal LOL.

 

[Backlund]

Buffalo and The Isles made a Trade that could change the face off both bluelines.......or just a simple trade

Isles aquire: Tyler Myers
Buffalo aquires: Micheal Del Zotto and 2011 4th round pick

To

Derek Roy
Tyler Ennis

To

Jason Blake
Nick Bonino
2011 1st round pick

I'm all for activity and blockbuster deals even but why can't we all just have an agreement to use some freaking common sense and at least somewhat ground whatever deals we make in reality.

I also like the idea of attaching an explanation for trades. If you can't articulate a somewhat plausible reason for your trade, than it gets vetoed.

I'd love to hear one for that Tyler Myers deal LOL.

Both Deals Vetoed.

I agree, I thought the GMs in this game were going to make normal decisions and not make these ridiculous blockbuster trades that are just stupid. I may not have been as active as I should have been so far and I apologize because I have had a lot of homework recently but you GMs need to read the rules and understand how to play this game so that people are not complaining.