72hockey guy
Registered User
- Nov 24, 2017
- 3,802
- 715
no i never said that, and never even approached that, in your fertile imagination you assume that. Im just saying that naming him captain and attempting to sign him indicate that they would rather keep him. only in your imagination does it mean what you think it does, many more players who are signed and named captain, remain with their teams, than are traded.So, to clarify, in your world being named captain and having contract negotiations means it's impossible for you to be traded. That's never happened in the history of the NHL so I must be idiotic. Again, the omniscient people posting here who always think their opinions hold more weight is nauseating. I need to go clean off my keyboard.
that much is statistically obvious except in your world of fantasy
as i said before:
"except their speculations are based on actual relevant occurrences, Like being named captain, real negotiations, all of yours speculations are based inside your imagination"
could he still be traded , if he doesnt sign sure, but that would be due to a relevant change of factors ie, not signing a contract, situations are dictated by changes of circumstances, so nothing is impossible, but lets wait to see what the circumstances are before we act rashly
Im just saying lets wait till we have a reason to speculate otherwise before you let your imagination run wild
heck, i would like Toronto to trade us Auston Matthews for Brock Nelson, but I'm not stitching Matthews on an Islanders jersey until I have some realistic expectation that it will happen, fantasies dont cut it.
Last edited: