Whitesnake
If you rebuild, they will come.
- Jan 5, 2003
- 89,541
- 36,979
Is there a gif of PK and Stone shaking hands?
Wonder if Stone said something like he'd kill PK or something....
Is there a gif of PK and Stone shaking hands?
The goal was a tap in, why should it be reviewed. The no goal was because it was scored after the whistle, that play is not reviewable.
Rule 38 – Video Goal Judge
Video review will be expanded in the following areas:
* Rule 38.4 (viii) has been modified to allow broader discretion to Hockey Operations to assist the referees in determining the legitimacy of all potential goals (e.g., to ensure they are "good hockey goals"). The revised Rule will allow Hockey Operations to correct a broader array of situations where video review clearly establishes that a "goal" or "no goal" call on the ice has been made in error. The new expanded rule will also allow Hockey Operations to provide guidance to referees on goal and potential goal plays where the referee has blown his whistle (or intended to blow his whistle) after having lost sight of the puck.
How about the Karlsson meter on the top right every 50 seconds?
Wonder if Stone said something like he'd kill PK or something....
To Analyzer: I'm with you on your assessment of Gryba. He's not going to dangle anyone out there, but he's a great bottom pairing guy- especially on a team that manages Karlsson's minutes the way that we do.
Hard to imagine you'd be wrong, but:
http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=730165
There are lots of whiners in here, but also lots of people who don't know what they're talking about.
To Analyzer: I'm with you on your assessment of Gryba. He's not going to dangle anyone out there, but he's a great bottom pairing guy- especially on a team that manages Karlsson's minutes the way that we do.
.
To Analyzer: I'm with you on your assessment of Gryba. He's not going to dangle anyone out there, but he's a great bottom pairing guy- especially on a team that manages Karlsson's minutes the way that we do.
Hard to imagine you'd be wrong, but:
http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=730165
There are lots of whiners in here, but also lots of people who don't know what they're talking about.
To Analyzer: I'm with you on your assessment of Gryba. He's not going to dangle anyone out there, but he's a great bottom pairing guy- especially on a team that manages Karlsson's minutes the way that we do.
Hard to imagine you'd be wrong, but:
http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=730165
There are lots of whiners in here, but also lots of people who don't know what they're talking about.
Curious(serious), has that extension of the rule been used and what was the outcome? I don't know.
But even if it was a reviewable play, it would not have been reversed based on the fact that the puck was playable by Price after he dropped it and the goal was scored after. It's not like he dropped the puck behind him....with no chances at retrieving it, and then the whistle was heard and puck went right in right after. While reviewable, it would never have been reversed.
Well at least Ottawa still has more playoff wins, and destroys the playoff +/-.
That is just stupid. He literally stopped shooting the puck. Get over it. Your golden boy injured him. He kept playing because he's a gamer and a good player. Still useful but no shot, which was a major weapon.
This happened 2013 in favour of Sens...karma?
[Yt]TUsdgOXknkc[/MEDIA]
This happened 2013 in favour of Sens...karma?
[Yt]TUsdgOXknkc[/MEDIA]
take advantage of calls?
habs were 1-20 on the ****ing PP!
I beleive Vancouver is the only team who's had a goal count because of it, not sure about any other cases.
There's a big "Go Sens Go" chant going on Elgin street (Sens Mile). Pretty cool. Only slightly drunk.
That's what I'm wondering. I'm all for sens fans suggesting it be reviewed but is there a track record of this type of situation being reversed INTO a goal?
How was elgin tonight? I was on Bank and it was pretty quiet.