Video removed for copyright , and not listed on hockey fights. Is this a recent fight because all i see are ones from years and years ago. Any additional video links or information?. As for the visor arguement, I'm not a fan of fighting/enforcement with a visor. However he had a recent injury which is why he had it back on I suppose. A true tough guy just uses the visor on his opponent to his advantage, simply punch the visor and use it to break the bridge of your opponents nose. If you punch visor, it crunches down on nose. Every. Single.Time.
Look here how where Glass fought Witowski a couple of years ago. Luke
has a visor, but out of respect for the code and enforcement and the scrap itself he legit
adjusts his visor and raises it right before the scrap starts.....Could all visor scrubs not do this?, such as Mcquaid in this situation?. Or does it have to be screwed loose first?.
So a player cannot choose his type of visor anymore?. Even if he is outside of his rookie season and a league veteran?. How is Tanner Glass , McLeod, and tens of other players still playing without them if they are player mandated?. What if you were a new age enforcer coming into the league ( Far fetched I know lol ) , would you simply be forced to wear a visor?. Never allowed to remove it even if you signed some papers or waivers, etc?. I would like for someone to expand on this and explain it in full detail. I am curious. If there is rules against " instigating with a visor " then it's a clear advantage to NOT have a visor if you intend on scrapping. So by that logic why would visors be a forced player mandate and not just optional?.