1st bold: So, you don't have one?
2. First of all, yikes. Johansen>Dubois (currently) Duchene >> Jenner, Wennberg>Dubinsky
Second of all. Why does Wennberg get lumped into the "former CBJ" group when he's still here? Your groups make no sense.
1. As pointed out below, leaguewide its A LOT of guys. Vast majority of guys, you will just say cant be acquired or are worse than Duchene, which will go along with your "no hope for CBJ" narrative, even if your only top 3-5 on that list now don't act like your "negativity ranking" has dropped like Puljujarvi's "value".
2. Yeah, yikes, all right. All I will say is that I trust my hockey/CBJ opinions over yours, because of countless amounts of opinions expressed and interactions with you around here.
I'll put it like this (currently), Dubois > Duchene = Johansen > Jenner > Dubinsky > Wennberg
Only thing people have to hold against Dubois is that he played with Panarin. Says A LOT right there, imo. Carry over from draft day and the scouting reports, also IMO.
Maybe this is a little unintended/ironic foreshadowing from you, but with my groups I am literally looking at it as my 1-2-3C group in MEANINGFUL NHL hockey's games NOT points only fantasy hockey. It has nothing to do with when they played with the CBJ, but with how they play they game. Its clear as day that the groups play significantly different "games" and/or have much different levels of intensity (and REAL defense imo) available while my group also brings something extra to the teams they are apart of. My groups make plenty of sense.