I hope you're being sarcastic.
I wouldn't consider signing a guy to league minimum a mistake. It's a very low-risk move. Especially when our depth at wing is pretty bad.
Good riddance.
I wouldn't consider signing a guy to league minimum a mistake. It's a very low-risk move. Especially when our depth at wing is pretty bad.
They gave a one-way deal to this guy and he was so bad that they waived him after he played just 8 games. Great job by the pro scouting...
I agree in principle.
But... did you see the guy play? He is what he is at this point. I'd be extremely surprised if another team even takes him. Money and cap considerations aren't what I'm thinking of, here... he was basically one of the 4 or 5 guys on the roster acting as a roadblock.
There isn't much down on the farm as far as forwards go. But I'd rather roll the dice on just about any of them over Matt D'Agostini.
I'm not saying he wasn't bad. I just wouldn't consider it a mistake, it was a one-year deal and he was getting paid nothing, there was no risk involved at all. Hindsight's 20/20.
I'm not saying he wasn't bad. I just wouldn't consider it a mistake, it was a one-year deal and he was getting paid nothing, there was no risk involved at all. Hindsight's 20/20.
I really don't know what they expect.
Don Waddell/Dan Bylsma
Killer combo.
I honestly though he could've done decently as a replacement for Kennedy. I also find it interesting that they decided to go with D'Agostini over Mason Raymond.
That could have been Raymond's decision more than the Pens. Not everybody wants to come here.I honestly though he could've done decently as a replacement for Kennedy. I also find it interesting that they decided to go with D'Agostini over Mason Raymond.
I have a feeling Jacques Martin played a role in D'Agostini signing here.