Whose the better player and whose more valuable?
Who do you think is the better player and has more value? ***EDIT PROVING MARNER>DRAISAITL WITH STATS**
AADVANCED STATS For Marner vs Draisaitl!
Marner: Takeaways = 85; Turnovers = 50; CF% = 59%; FF% = 57%; TOI/GAME: 16:39 ; 3.1 Points/60
Draisaitl: Takeaways = 78; Turnovers = 84; CF% = 53%; FF% = 54%; TOI/GAME: 19:32 ; 3.1 Points/60
How in the world is Draisaitl Outproducing Marner???
I provided stats backing up;
1) Marner > Draisaitl Defensively!
2) Marner = Draisaitl Offensively! ------> Marner = Draisaitl P.60
I'm not going to get into the rest of this debate of who's actually better, but this "proof" is useless.
Takeaways / turnovers are nearly useless. They are completely subjective, and recorded in-house.
Raw corsi is a useless statistic for players on teams that were drastically different, and for players with very different roles. Raw corsi is essentially just +/-. In fact, it's exactly +/-, except with decimals, so for whatever reason people thing it's "advanced." In reality, there's nothing advanced about total shot attempts for, minus total shot attempts against, which is all corsi is. At the very least use relative stats.
Points/60 is one of the most overused / overvalued advanced stats I see people use. For whatever reason some people using it think it's absolutely predictive, and that if a guy with a great points per 60 was given more ice time his point totals would linearly increase - but that's practically never the case. The stat completely ignores the role, usage, competition, line-mates, etc., of players. For limited use I think it's a fine stat provide its contextualized, but there are generally good reasons that coaches give guys the minutes they have, and giving Marner an extra 1.5 minutes of even strength ice time per game, the difference between him and Draisaitl, does not mean his even strength production will linearly increase. Hockey isn't an equation
that basic, as much as seem people on this board seem to think it is.
You're running around this thread shooting stats out, but I don't actually think you understand what any of them mean. Using takeaways and turnovers and raw corsi to prove ? sort of indicates that.